Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 08 November 2019 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A9212084F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:28:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzy0pRIapE5Z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E86F120833 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:28:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1521; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1573205327; x=1574414927; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=Slxs/SZYEtS71MQPYLVAxJmSr/UurBpSoGFPnttWG2E=; b=DGBeSl9RCxVRSC89iIbS7MG0qV10rOEpnbK5E5Pt2Hl6XwtY/pQgjJVO TNS7fsKHXzY7EcXR1VCRCRoyi2+hhK28NUGuJ4wqa/uLq/u/DfX3CM1os /NWjVPT35LSAUSse6ioFpsT7VGyua08XCcQ2rou8sv7hWK5WRcZT73vxV I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0APAAAHNMVd/xbLJq1lGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgW0BAQEBAQELAYNgIBIqhCmJA4gniVa?= =?us-ascii?q?RUQIHAQEBCQMBAS8BAYRAAoQyNwYOAgMLAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FQ4VSAQUdBlY?= =?us-ascii?q?QCxgqAgIhNgYTFIMOAYJGAy6xWHWBMoVOgkENghsQgTYBgVKKWYF/gREnH4J?= =?us-ascii?q?MPoIbhToygiwElk6WfkGCLoI2gRWNZ4QSG4IsEIdhhA6LSpkOjBGDGQIEBgU?= =?us-ascii?q?CFYFoI4FYMxoIGxVlAYJBPhIRFJ59QAMwAZEnAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,280,1569283200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="18904344"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Nov 2019 09:28:45 +0000
Received: from [10.61.204.59] ([10.61.204.59]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA89SiKF017121 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 09:28:45 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <C6AA7609-A36F-41A5-83A3-960ED7330211@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_45D59405-7C3E-47E6-B663-CE380DC6D7F1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:28:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ca7a87c8-d841-c13c-3131-aa44acac226f@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <0053C5D9-E4D7-4BE0-9B73-3B7FC25561FB@akamai.com> <f0069562-5b4b-3a08-124f-1a8d24dfd0cd@cs.tcd.ie> <e7ebf607-cbf8-8ebf-9dca-0aec96ff517d@gmail.com> <20191105092422.GA61969@kduck.mit.edu> <ca7a87c8-d841-c13c-3131-aa44acac226f@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.204.59, [10.61.204.59]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dyUccogU64MCjOD3w4ubAmoi5c0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:28:49 -0000

On 5 Nov 2019, at 23:54, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> 
>> 2) sometimes the directorate reviews come too late for the IESG ballot for approval
> 
> In that case, perhaps the response should be to defer the ballot automatically, and make it public that the reason is a late review.

Please not automatic.  It takes forever to get documents through the system as is.  It’s understandable that sometimes a deferral is appropriate.  But the AD needs to make that call, not a computer.

Eliot