Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EA212D0B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgcgmRtujnTQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C289B12D0BF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 4so149721887pfd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dcXAGFVKNxvWwarrBfXS2O8fTA4cWge8y1VtmWaKpUQ=; b=KIx0YUSFPnj+Mnt8nDLPKW2mc//Yz9ntmtieWowTbcVQGLlfHxwxdBXwqMUrPrzt7b OUqOhx5LQAld9Fs9ValCDlNecXVoxPUrfIVwz3pLAs2wh4hm10fjbbUXAtilZJekJzPw 5CMVG4Bi7bP+CV4lL5/qflScV8QjMkz0GIV232kux+biJNc96ZeQ9eSC+G/cYZ7sm622 x+21QyecxFx6IACIvUHN46SBcVjeKKXNChIae3etQoEb+JmRBpsOjLRjrplyg8TOAP1v u88aL2DVBmyIIIWiOZ2510lSDeXunsCoxmHzrC86ITuSc/raVXGhOXLmErGklV7pjVud 5RTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dcXAGFVKNxvWwarrBfXS2O8fTA4cWge8y1VtmWaKpUQ=; b=DvNWOPHZhMDPk182WFvElLc74BMaDXMBPCxgFlooISKXMlLs0kNCnBC9cdB4TAUd+f Tygjbw84Yah68b1JzNw0J3PutdMD7jL9UVSct9dB542m5sJiyFmuxNwSGTrqnUGyiWVw M8j0icFlJgVU6SlSJAY8EVnNFoK3HPvjOx7RZYF4m063ZG9YGhktNrILvDi8zpTCV2gg aW0dL81npDDm4ZEGXERSH2iQoc1crazPxRLQJRvqV5PcU9yk23OaFzVf+RLx2X5eIC1D egn3B4P320l1JPJbSCQCdZnWmwPgxqneeXBqMX2XNt1FlOEWbP8CXa75vweacmiQRwZx zVUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIpQ10T6wQlz9TomYtSbZZbgzWgAUsjdzcoErGoE9/4p+R0ncxvp8AT/wDscFk1VQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.193.226 with SMTP id hr2mr48647697pac.20.1458598126355; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4373:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4373:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ac1sm43033965pad.41.2016.03.21.15.08.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
To: Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160317191526.8948.67217.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8A0BEE90-2B70-4B41-A968-A8E4CE7824F6@icloud.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56F070ED.3080704@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:08:45 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8A0BEE90-2B70-4B41-A968-A8E4CE7824F6@icloud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dzJ-Hzv1ovKdMADQyXStZzuR6FI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:09:05 -0000

Greg,

I object to reclassifying RFC 1752 (the IPng recommendation itself). Admittedly,
it *is* a historic document in the true meaning of the word, but I don't think
its status as PS is wrong - it expresses the fact that there was rough consensus
in 1994. Just because a document is old doesn't make it obsolete.

I also don't see the point in reclassifying RFC 1550 (the IPng white paper
solicitation). It is informational today just as it was then.

I object to reclassifying RFC 1380 (the ROAD report). Again, it is informational
about the situation in 1992. Actually, I think that everybody should read it
every couple of years.

Finally I object to reclassifying RFC 1287 (the IAB/IESG "Future Internet Architecture"
paper). It's information on how things looked in 1991. Also, if issued today, it
would most likely be in the IAB document stream, so the IESG can't reclassify
it anyway.

Regards
   Brian

On 22/03/2016 10:18, Greg Skinner wrote:
> If it is not too late, I would like to request that RFCs 1287, 1380, 1550, and 1752 also be moved to Historic.  1287, 1380, and 1752 are referenced in the draft (1550 is referenced from 1752), and concern the replacement of IPv4 with (what would eventually become) IPv6.
> 
> Please see the following link from the sunset4 WG for more information.
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/dsUpNpJsZZt4IEfS4afJKOyExnU <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/dsUpNpJsZZt4IEfS4afJKOyExnU>
> 
> Greg
> 
>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:15 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org <mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
>> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
>>  <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org> mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org> instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/>
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>>
>>
> 
>