IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 08 August 2016 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B5512D860 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0JZxt23sAEc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055BA12D85A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17879 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2016 18:47:29 +0200
Received: from p5dec22a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.34.164) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 8 Aug 2016 18:47:29 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8yD=seBA0_xWzwWwRWBXWawZ9+agmQUxoab8J57F9yP8bv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:47:28 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <16EABB75-86F6-44C7-883D-60ECE60B6247@kuehlewind.net>
References: <CAP8yD=tyqViJQhNihPioxdGH8fP+eZ_Z4fwtzkTDrLxut1NmgA@mail.gmail.com> <51F4D053-22C1-4F0E-ADEE-CCAF48B931E1@csperkins.org> <45871F4C-2EE2-4185-B9EE-3D4E7F6E9D57@kuehlewind.net> <2FB5FED1-3C27-4692-A067-1FF1CB412BC1@csperkins.org> <ad0d3aa9-326b-5c1f-cc7b-2bd3f46ae57d@alvestrand.no> <CAP8yD=seBA0_xWzwWwRWBXWawZ9+agmQUxoab8J57F9yP8bv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/e75mO-SBsBzHLNezOy6vLkAV0E8>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, amankin@salesforce.com, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tsv-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports@tools.ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:54:14 -0000

Hi all,

thanks! Having a new section is even better! This could be used to cover all transmissions performed by rtcweb (not only RTP-based media)!

Mirja


> Am 08.08.2016 um 00:22 schrieb Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>:
> 
> All sounds good to me. Thank you, Harald and Colin.
> 
> On Aug 7, 2016 17:30, "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> Den 04. aug. 2016 14:07, skrev Colin Perkins:
> > Hi,
> 
> >> What’s about the following?
> >>
> >> "For transport of media, secure RTP is used.  The details of the profile of RTP used are described in "RTP Usage“ [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage], which mandates the use of a circuit breaker [draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-17] and congestion control (see [draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09] for further guidance).“
> >
> > No objection, but it’s not my draft to make the change.
> >
> 
> This works for me. New section entitled "Congestion control".
> It needs to also mention that SCTP is already congestion-controlled.
> _______________________________________________
> Tsv-art mailing list
> Tsv-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email