Re: On plenary functions

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

> On 2020-08-17, at 20:58, Jay Daley <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/status-report/ietf-progress-report.html

Thank you!

2019-08-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1778"
2019-09-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1776"
2019-10-subcounts.csv:"ietf","3887"
2019-11-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1777"
2019-12-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1774"
2020-01-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1855"
2020-02-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1788"
2020-03-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1791"
2020-04-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1794"
2020-05-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1790"
2020-06-subcounts.csv:"ietf","1797"
2020-07-subcounts.csv:"ietf",”1799”

I’m not sure where the 3887 came from, and whether the smaller 1855 spike also was an artifact.  I also don’t know if this is counting private subscribers the same way mailman does.  Assuming that it doesn’t, and that these are end-of-month figures, we would have had ~ 1830 total at the start of August, 1820 about 10 days later (I’m not sure that really was Aug 13), and 1780 now.  That would be 2.5 % loss over the recent logorrhea.

Grüße, Carsten

PS.:
2019-10-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1724"
2019-11-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1629"
2019-12-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1596"
2020-01-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1569"
2020-02-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1559"
2020-03-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1548"
2020-04-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1538"
2020-05-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1522"
2020-06-subcounts.csv:"last-call","1512"
2020-07-subcounts.csv:"last-call",”1504"

Hmm.  Color me surprised.