IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 111 schedule update

Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 09 May 2021 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F493A24B7; Sun, 9 May 2021 03:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaXUeRV6oAsd; Sun, 9 May 2021 03:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C37CC3A24B5; Sun, 9 May 2021 03:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id x5so13538710wrv.13; Sun, 09 May 2021 03:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ioZzUTy7uozdt4us67sA+3xHkmU0HRZKlTu1PYsOtQ0=; b=qBfa62SkYOsXVktXESjIIVldh2L74N0ktmNT3pfS5hAbP06pId1W+TzB7+CGcu5MhI yn1DhpXWXyaXo6JeXUi56TQ9uUJ0WSfLVDJDk+QXsWnLiK2ESz/1VOxCJPQX9C1Jt9aY Ikx/uIPRSWmT4ClicgsuTsD3Bmw1WO/D5HZj+G4dAHFUI86+0/1eOgqpZWPjCOgIPteh 888txC62e+wT35vN3rSD4Ty7yLT+D/1nd5AP3+XrkokQW/CMfMiKxSXxmFaXTGNfrcji /AcEVUwEc0Hgj+FL8/3Pmt3Ezp19bQW47dPuU0OWhbwTHwgGMkEhLF6ZMysppZ0wZ7vq gEPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ioZzUTy7uozdt4us67sA+3xHkmU0HRZKlTu1PYsOtQ0=; b=N73QzVEmqQrONMaeKQ9hgVrxl14wlelCPP29FU6jPD4dZA3fjr7IfNI+b2lhoM7Fgu HBnbKmlO5MI74Y4cRsGHdZVytXxDTOJwMj3j1lQ1cLmLzB+n5T7bysXl1YwtgzgkmLoD VTLFILJWeukqMJ/oJyg1VDqfuszMOO8Ezav45lpXjH9wb9eYekX34uRE0KGgZT2st1Ix qVD5MtQCIJJTpiIOrA8vfevxkB4y483o1YgCpvpt1VJMHK6lcPWAJ4EQACAef+0s5usR qtbH5DXIVdOERS5Jw+j4KPq5Pe8zSLQxWBJiD8tnTjOZtk2i5VHReECe43hsrmvgIn1l UlCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533G/vIkpCaIRVDLvnoRLzsgq5+sAXSWFvSRr+CSD02FCi0m6DAq 5epLjyR5qc0MOVdpKPNzJhLEFCDgHGg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyw3hdAigAUaEbviLalwNAHc3B0whoqjJnOeQC6SsXF8uhnJNJCSS7FBswxiOj9VGXhzpgl8Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:690c:: with SMTP id t12mr14362928wru.292.1620554590502; Sun, 09 May 2021 03:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 20010a88d51011.ipv6.customer.clara.net ([2001:a88:d510:1101:1996:c894:c259:e3ef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j18sm14013653wmq.27.2021.05.09.03.03.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 09 May 2021 03:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: IETF 111 schedule update
From: Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <90C8714C-CB8A-4622-BA53-FC763F0B9FC9@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 11:03:09 +0100
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <54F074A0-FC71-4C6F-A858-948B3655BDD2@gmail.com>
References: <90C8714C-CB8A-4622-BA53-FC763F0B9FC9@ietf.org>
To: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eHeyRmoo-GQa90j20cQVZIh_-jE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 10:03:18 -0000

Hi,

Is 12pm to 6pm normal working hours in San Francisco?  Wouldn’t 10am to 4pm or 11am to 5pm fall better into a 9-5 day?   

As a nit, I think you should list CEST not CET below.  CET is one hour ahead of UTC, CEST is two hours ahead during summer time.

Tim

> On 7 May 2021, at 12:21, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as previously announced, IETF 111 will be an online meeting [1]. IETF 111 working sessions will take place from 26-30 July 2021, from 12:00 to 18:00 US Pacific Daylight Saving Time each day.
> 
> This time block was chosen by the IESG to schedule the meeting during the normal working hours in San Francisco, the original meeting location, and to be consistent with the intent of guidance in Section 2 of RFC 8719 related to meeting rotation. IETFs 107 through 110 similarly started approximately midday local time in the original meeting locations [2].
> 
> For selected time zones, this translates to:
> 
> PDT:  12:00 - 18:00
> EDT:  15:00 - 21:00
> UTC:  19:00 - 01:00
> CET:  21:00 - 03:00
> IST:  00:30 - 06:30
> CST:  03:00 - 09:00
> AEST: 05:00 - 11:00
> 
> General feedback and guidance about online meeting scheduling should be directed to the SHMOO working group at manycouches@ietf.org.
> 
> Best,
> Lars Eggert
> IETF Chair
> 
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/nqPCMpAcN5KEFAXulGITbpurvi0
> 
> [2] IETF 107 ran from 13:00-17:10, IETF 108 from 13:00-19:00,
>    IETF 109 from 12:00-18:00, and IETF 110 from 13:00-19:00 local time.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email