Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 21 October 2013 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=10065ae11f=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB1211E8429 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAIDmIo-tLZ2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [213.172.48.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBCA11E826D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1382384740; x=1382989540; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=QmXbr0yot8qGdvXdVS53g1cFf T+TE1vus3WR00NA6e8=; b=r7HHlqO66Fhxf2HnNTz3MAaFlgDDQMVi4jUCkoCCx Y+1FTqLB7vcIHIpaDx9knA3eodnFQ0FZS3Xk3HZfuVVJ4vZSV8LbAGZYGVR5kSWy KoQ4zaQATg0PQ9Fv3P4Ci51vxIF4r5EeAw3wLu+32ZivrLVWdImWeoPbTyLsQhdu rM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=NnRhzOjRcVJZf7osFKWnWDt7Ehqog4v9w4LHJGIfst8aNC3gVt4wxWYTa7Yh iWbbWfbGYCfZ3FrJsEGzJD7DVwOPjOvIzbeuLhH8iczG+EFL4P6YLw9nm QYTm+yKm7D9D6MPvn/Ah6fglAX/CoSrzRKGBs2blNdQu2MzBlAPH7A=;
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:45:40 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.102] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50004494843.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:45:40 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:45:40 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:131021:md50004494843::VZVzixM1urEEOHoR:000046+z
X-MDRemoteIP: 87.216.40.21
X-Return-Path: prvs=10065ae11f=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:45:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: mars.techno.cat@gmail.com, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CE8B4F40.B9893%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:50:27 -0000
Hi, As Sergeant-at-arms, I agree with other previous postings and believe that anonymous posting is not tolerable in the IETF mail exploders. Moreover, I also believe that this the content of your emails are off-topic to the IETF, even ISOC is the IETF umbrella, ISOC tax declaration and other details is irrelevant to this list as well. This is the reason why I've yesterday, instructed the secretariat to avoid further postings from you. If you decide to identify yourself, as the rest of the posters, and be on-topic, you will be allowed to post again. Meanwhile, refrain to use other anonymous emails, as the secretariat will automatically keep banning you. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: Techno CAT <mars.techno.cat@gmail.com> Responder a: <mars.techno.cat@gmail.com> Fecha: lunes, 21 de octubre de 2013 20:04 Para: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> CC: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, <ietf@ietf.org>, <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Asunto: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com >"Calling someone a troll is an ad hominem. We aren't supposed to do that >in the IETF. At least, not publicly."[1] > >"It is rude. >It is bullying." [2] > >HARASSMENT by Brian E Carpenter has been noted for the Legal Record > >http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/ >"Network Geeks - How They Built the Internet" > >=========================== > > >HARASSMENT by Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr ><mailto:bortzmeyer@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>> has been noted for the Legal Record >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg83330.html > >=========================== > >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg83360.html >"judgment needs to be applied by the ombudsperson & the rest of the IETF >management > >[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg83364.html >[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg83362.html > >"you are encouraged to raise your concern in confidence with one of the >Ombudspersons" >http://www.intgovforum.org >http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/541/541650477/541650477_2 >01112_990.pdf > > > > >On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Brian E Carpenter ><brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi Jordi, > >We seem to have a new troll using the address mars.techno.cat@gmail.com > >Can you deal with it appropriately, please? > >Thanks > > Brian > > > > > > > >-- > >@Techno_CAT_r >http://Twitter.com/Techno_CAT_r > > ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.ca… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Techno CAT
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Donald Eastlake
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Anonymous postings SM
- RE: Anonymous postings l.wood
- Re: Anonymous postings Melinda Shore
- Re: Anonymous postings Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Anonymous postings Melinda Shore
- RE: Anonymous postings SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Barry Leiba
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- IETF::ISOC (was Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John C Klensin
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Scott Brim
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jari Arkko
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Thomas Narten
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John C Klensin
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… l.wood
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Christian Huitema
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… joel jaeggli
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Scott Brim
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Richard Shockey
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Douglas Otis
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… ned+ietf
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John Levine
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… David Conrad
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- On anonymity.... (was: Sergeant at arms: please d… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Douglas Otis
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dan Harkins
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… TSG - personal
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon