Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 06 September 2018 20:07 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123EC130DE2; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-taps-minset.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, taps@ietf.org
Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153626446703.11686.5776675418414453097@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:07:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eTKUHfw3NxnCb8FE9cZQv3JIle8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 20:07:47 -0000
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-taps-minset-08 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2018-09-06 IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-04 IESG Telechat date: 2018-09-13 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC (Repeating one thing from my Last Call review for the benefit of the IESG): This was a big effort, and it appears that it was helpful to the folks working on the interface document, but it's not clear how it will be useful to implementers. The IESG should consider whether this, like requirements documents, needs to be in the RFC series. The most likely use I can see in the future would be for historians, and a different and shorter presentation would serve them better.
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-… Robert Sparks
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-min… Aaron Falk
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-min… Robert Sparks
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-min… Aaron Falk