Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D57F129581; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:43:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J23R_4Uw8a3T; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F26D5129524; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f188so31222587pgc.3; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:43:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lrbwbY4Pv6OC601NWXuxgu9xIpMRaGRmYGkBV2geiaQ=; b=m4rPJyj+Ili9vphhys3Cxjb+t60mrivQHNrcZ7JsENj0q+Q/bp4/zS3oR9H8HbB0iE 0FpopnWJo6lkHImM4C0+o99RQ5yGs81Pv7DYg4sHswD+OYlpKvQCTgLtjwxZ33NrXqqn 0sLKz7YhdQOuDRSBVn40LqRcYvxYOyzf7x2znneNkBb62gbKVL7KRq5kevHf8JDXxBpX ZzVZAqe9JSAfxeZB9j8/8hj+w2duV79QvHagdMhu0Vu/vNhlunb5l9tK50wH5vejPGcB LiLGicZdc0SMuVYUrILl9afNJybJPh9cpyt1DUzMIQh3sYIPsrnIBuyFUzWTm86eiOwB /sbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lrbwbY4Pv6OC601NWXuxgu9xIpMRaGRmYGkBV2geiaQ=; b=MD1EJDpu8SSuAwG3oIqWTDHCLZ2Kai7MM2AaPN9xJt/qTYZJ8KkByOTuAttZKJ98zG LlgbbKhHVUD6kptd8tjAd5r0QGc46EOQ0M1t84b/2gMBKnXVUEYPnepNbjrU2QE8xsDe M1o8BX18r5yvbS48DTWmDIue049hbAraOLsTjUuOXLRd8uALqAhE1SrTUt3o63zYbKX7 Sx7io15mjzGXSXddTrSaCcmqx6vNIrhxHFrzVQGER1++RCVV8wLH0CGMlNjJyrZ0QjGd V3ZTo+oCHEC0iemWya0z/OSED1W5MqlUE0YY1a4ZYP93KYudfgRA2JX8BZBZm3qJ7gq3 xUNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvel/1etVowqfR5dt4dfNW04qS+74UTdN7tr8FntwR+o0Pc5J/zOCxRGa6zvDIa1TA==
X-Received: by 10.99.51.132 with SMTP id z126mr39163834pgz.173.1478983401483; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.30.1.11] ([175.193.196.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k67sm24257842pfk.69.2016.11.12.12.43.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:43:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
To: iaoc@ietf.org
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk> <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20160714083607.0ce35198@elandnews.com> <0AA26172-A842-4E6C-B7C4-DFFEA25DE22B@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160715083734.0bf97f78@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20161112065759.0b031850@resistor.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <82db4220-3c42-3133-08c0-1d6f6dc2f0d4@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 05:43:06 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20161112065759.0b031850@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eUHfPloFzwXX2NwGHfmTtJBJ2iE>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:43:23 -0000

On 11/13/2016 1:26 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> According to the IETF Administrative Director the IETF is required by
> California law to have
> an accurate privacy policy on its websites.


Why is the IETF, an international, unincorporated organization, subject 
to California law?

It well might be good for the IETF to have a privacy policy -- in fact 
it's difficult to believe it isn't -- but motivating it in this way 
doesn't make obvious sense.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net