IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Resignation request

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF593A124C; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:46:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jKoUW8hH-uy7; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:46:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA80F3A0871; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:46:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770032EC009D; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:46:20 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snZhuztq6sjZ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:46:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.50.224] (173-166-5-67-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.67]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D7682EC0087; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:46:06 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: Resignation request
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7B7787A-48E5-407F-9E81-BDEC2F1B2169@steffann.nl>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 16:46:05 -0500
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B7EB1335-7BBE-426F-A5D7-820BCCFE6CE2@sobco.com>
References: <3EF6505C-D442-41A4-A681-26ACF818BB4D@sobco.com> <C7B7787A-48E5-407F-9E81-BDEC2F1B2169@steffann.nl>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ebbSZWL-Uo-MoXVZ7trOLvEeEm4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:46:23 -0000

well, that is a funky situation

thanks

Scott

> On Mar 2, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> I have no information about the situation but I do not understand why an AD would be declaring consensus in any case - 
>> that is normally the responsibility of WG chairs.  see RFC 2418 section 3.3 
> 
> The only active/available WG chair was a co-author of this draft.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sander
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email