IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6B21F887C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:52:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMBxjdzuHtX8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:52:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E45821F8864 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:52:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1TfJL0-00076Z-GV; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:52:42 +0000
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:52:41 +0900
Message-ID: <m2y5hgui46.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
In-Reply-To: <50BBE5C3.7050802@gmail.com>
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net> <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com> <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com> <50BBB940.1020302@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121202130842.0a8266e0@resistor.net> <50BBE5C3.7050802@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: SM <sm@resistor.net>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:52:51 -0000

> I would prefer to have the I+D as non-wg item until we are sure that we
> are willing to support it as RFC.

i thought that was wglc.  but i am a dinosaur.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email