Re: DNS
"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com> Sat, 09 January 1999 04:40 UTC
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id XAA24886 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 23:40:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from torque.pothole.com ([209.94.126.195]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id XAA24834 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 23:32:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by torque.pothole.com (8.8.2/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA17133; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 23:30:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199901090430.XAA17133@torque.pothole.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: torque.pothole.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Jan Devos <webmaster@COOL.ST>
cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DNS
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jan 1999 23:02:24 +0100." <199901082157.PAA14368@iris.host4u.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 23:30:48 -0500
From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
X-Mts: smtp
Country code domains are under the control of the government of that country, if their is such a government and it exerts that control. So the answer is, yes, if the top-level-domain is a country code managed by a government or company with the backing of the government, they "are allowed to play with the dns" to approximately the same extent they are allowed to "play" (by seizure, taxation, regulations, etc.) with other property within their territory. Donald From: Jan Devos <webmaster@cool.st> Message-Id: <199901082157.PAA14368@iris.host4u.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 99 23:02:24 +0100 To: <ietf@ietf.org> >±1 year ago, I bought several .st domains (± 50). Including downing.st, fir.st, be.st, cool.st, central.s,... > >Howvever recently they took a couple of them back without warning and later they mai led me with the excuse that they already belonged to someone else. > >First of all it took them 1 year to discover there error and second they didn't just do it with one but with several url's. > >Remember that it were active sites, who were building up a viewing base. > >My question is if top-level-domain managers are allowed to play with the dns'es and if I can do something against it? > >Sincerely, > >Jan Devos-------------#### >####---------------------- >@Ùôerror in line #516 in >itemDelimiter_user_agent_¨ >####---------------------- >####---------------------- >####-----webmaster@cool.st >
- DNS Jan Devos
- Re: DNS Joel Jaeggli
- Re: DNS Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: DNS John C Klensin
- DNS Bill Cunningham
- Re: DNS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DNS Donald Eastlake 3rd
- Re: DNS Jim Fleming
- Re: DNS Bill Manning
- RE: DNS Haren Visavadia
- Re: DNS Scott W Brim
- RE: DNS Bill Strahm
- Re: DNS Jim Fleming
- RE: DNS Haren Visavadia
- RE: DNS Haren Visavadia
- Re: RE: DNS Christopher Evans
- Re: RE: DNS Jim Fleming
- Re: RE: RE: DNS Christopher Evans
- RE: DNS Haren Visavadia