RE: [79all] IETF Badge

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 11 November 2010 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA2D3A69D0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:46:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWLU0dm50Gkr; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:46:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9FE3A6965; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADdY20zGmAcF/2dsb2JhbACiQXGmXQKZPYVKBIRaiSM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,182,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="218082487"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2010 05:46:46 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,182,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="539234336"
Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.22]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2010 05:46:45 -0500
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.1.90]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([135.11.52.22]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:46:44 -0500
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:44:12 -0500
Subject: RE: [79all] IETF Badge
Thread-Topic: [79all] IETF Badge
Thread-Index: AcuBeQL5E0TphVurSyKoJ3IlO17yIQAFF3yx
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A0B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <iaoc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:46:21 -0000

________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Weiler [weiler+ietf@watson.org]

At the IAOC open mike yesterday, I observed that the above
announcement was made with no explanation, with no advance warning,
and with no opportunity for community input.  I also observed that it
is a change in practice.
_______________________________________________

Is it a change in practice?  My impression is that all IETF events require a badge for admission, although I suppose the practice may have been more lax than the policy.

Dale