IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52728126E01 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 09:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3iW-3jj8DmIz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C425C12D949 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q13-v6so45738876qtp.4 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 May 2018 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=N+Qd9EZVEpQeCU5+TorQHMZ/I59+ghGfkyIRkfVjOwI=; b=TsSZJuNvjIXqVRkGlfwOwI//Ctb503xyLKtaEHp/vCITDDTfGHg02gY84iUIn/ptZ9 7TIAaqqPTdySZzhITL27ZDPp+Ckd7CWHC04ve1cbc5RmOnUTi1oaV6C28WgpVaJJup39 j4v2hWTo3QqXM2/oPaucIXPygNWHO/4YWi6hNbM1I9JRRkrZvO3Ig91k+thvTJF1EyK9 g/DLvZd1zknxwtR/PoU9uXvG3VzMBION7k1QrFnIYbFoRM2TSjEB8TLWVUKQ4696k3PL LraEmPGoMFbAR7RUvQRl1/ZoBfMKq6sAwD2HlzEX85xbBYSmsbBx5ETMy/7gmdJ+0vlr EztA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=N+Qd9EZVEpQeCU5+TorQHMZ/I59+ghGfkyIRkfVjOwI=; b=R43BQX+tnBQ+Bwi/Kjyuo2BD/tdOy6m9YgEsujoZHY25/qSNRwHsjeRr9up3u4NxSl V7BMyEERUTA0ckiawZnW/iQfHSqpE+NLafcGbLhNEghLYguf+aT9G1z1CZkLLehCp3XM KnympVfEskpPILtRdHIp9c+wXRp+krDMciACJFbmPEhhWdjDg5In0BDCapvsVD2X5wCB sGfLhB5/tGG7CiFjlSb04oYjamLbz/RvrkViFXxQCnTUw6y0HQcyCWVra9pGQtWgYsSa lEChjBI5HS2PCnjxPDYbOhDxBdGNFxlI0ZI/vzL5P9zAH6t1Dzlm8727wouVZokk/by0 iMvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBGkxcPOvVU6+SVT60w101xbwog3WIMN0rt1cSxdM+ZLr7B/PpT 8FSYjMxRpIZwU+mYaHg98tHAxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr4OiaAHM/2hA7w6yu7S4rbPVj7AEEOqkDaaESAJMCbNCpvpGXVmTZwB/asnM9DX0HBcNytug==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:8856:: with SMTP id 22-v6mr26689044qvm.79.1525884998952; Wed, 09 May 2018 09:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.17] ([8.20.190.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm22755691qku.18.2018.05.09.09.56.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 May 2018 09:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8=HKLR89dvDTuO4eguPE5LCV-YPmcbBr1WdUuFNi+NsBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 12:56:36 -0400
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf <IETF@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C636B337-D0C8-44C1-AED9-A117B6DB1BA6@fugue.com>
References: <152584638193.2839.7801870228413280951@ietfa.amsl.com> <c30fd21a-85ee-734c-771c-00ff65490acb@cisco.com> <CABmDk8=HKLR89dvDTuO4eguPE5LCV-YPmcbBr1WdUuFNi+NsBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eg9Ijf_KGAWJd7SuwjmzW6zrplU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 16:56:41 -0000

FWIW, I agree that it's a bit odd to have the second hand smoke requirement and not the mold requirement.  They are both important, though, as our collective memory of Hiroshima no doubt tells us.  Singapore was a very interesting venue, but the airborne irritants there were pretty bad.  I do not think they were worse than staying in a smoking room, but they were on a similar level of badness, at least for me.  They weren't quite as triggering, because of my history with second hand smoke, but letting go of psychosomatic issues for a moment, I think they should be taken just as seriously.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email