IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 03 February 2011 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43713A676A; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:06:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.982, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KuUiCIV7NzDp; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033103A63EC; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:06:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1318dFc002088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:08:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D4A0017.6050401@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:08:39 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02
References: <4D48B4EA.20503@isi.edu> <4D490FED.6060303@gont.com.ar> <4D4996AE.8060302@isi.edu> <4D49FF33.7030107@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4D49FF33.7030107@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org" <tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues@tools.ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, TSV Dir <tsv-dir@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:06:05 -0000

On 2/2/2011 5:04 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
...
>> At the least, it's worth noting that geolocation is already broken by
>> tunnels, and that IP addressing does not ensure geographic proximity
>> before attributing breakage on NATs or other sharing.
>
> Tunnels need not break geo-location. -- They do not masquerade the
> source address. Or am I missing something?

When I tunnel using an ISI address, whomever sees my address thinks I'm 
in California.

Except that there's an ISI office in Virginia too.

And if I'm VPN'd in, the tunnel makes me have an ISI IP address 
regardless of where I actually am.

Joe

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status