Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions

Brian E Carpenter <> Mon, 19 December 2016 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A702C1294C3 for <>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:16:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFr_IVoBf_Kd for <>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A951294B1 for <>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id p66so54616470pga.2 for <>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:16:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8+lM16XV80XyP8LYCK/CwhUGqXarDZOFHurRkU1E8ZQ=; b=pcPA7m3qBUSxcK2Phty8vQlyWkBDHkoCmrH53MZZC76fqBR8wbIS0Ua2glz6sZGZY5 wE/6dWREdFlJInd/jn0e+vrG3wF7uuVNofkhCmSU5NkCpxp/kMcNDK6PMUiTCgtLuAZP +C369DgiWECJ8MFBF5pkqWDYpb2+M6LCvU0dqoFmF+eVPjKJlF+0h/xbU+95rHpEbpl4 G2igiXunB1Gk2x/6cTIY0UvbbeAU4DKerECOsCyqufQ079U6C/0bREAYZYemoXVAPgwJ ashQRQn7GTXsP2c+ihztz+bHmHD/Mee0FRhYjX7rApmPXPUGTxwOeZluY9ymygDCfZNA /ocA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8+lM16XV80XyP8LYCK/CwhUGqXarDZOFHurRkU1E8ZQ=; b=XhHicE6Ya6eDsrbh1xhJ5xwI/w3sWk6OqGquDs/re19E1e/u9raDeeGXRJUc3XwUdh fkvvg5t6nV3gutuivbLbMWg0Yn4N312rSKr0HBSRro5CsSbjyAprerdepE312/v/Xo3v VanXp83Pt54ElHv6PRkxXYulFWV7ZisTIhd8RaSYE7jF6mfUhqAyJqVXO760+SbbxfAq d6LKw1ywvK0IIJajAam2+KWCTKWHH6xP9NoO9bPKa05W2h311jqeAwqTC8z34HEHs6f3 3q07/v4WD1nwunjoY9zIotB0OETJcnNJZIUsK5aN9QRYu7mQNdpW5uuFCgywu6RNBo4i BU9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02aySCT2joDmAPF4StxFKlY6LH5eYIe8Ueo3KHm0zgW7XhoZBPcElFTTHbYJn2gtA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id g34mr29787552pld.36.1482110168943; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7145:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7145:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by with ESMTPSA id n24sm26544095pfb.0.2016. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions
To: John Levine <>,
References: <20161218220828.14035.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Brian E Carpenter <>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:16:05 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161218220828.14035.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:16:10 -0000

On 19/12/2016 11:08, John Levine wrote:
>> Send them a canned message stating that the only solution available
>> to them is changing to a different From address that does not have
>> this issue. What else can they do?
> Conclude that the IETF has jumped the shark* and go do something else.

The question was what can a mailman list admin do. I don't see another answer,
except setting the 'anonymous list' mode ("Hide the sender of a message, replacing
it with the list address (Removes From, Sender and Reply-To fields").

> As I keep asking, how much blood are we prepared to lose here?

Not that much.