Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 16 January 2015 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B8C1ACD69 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m87B-h3QBJPs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D7A1ACD36 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:53:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=51542; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421416426; x=1422626026; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=VkHClVTCeJowqeialANTcBb42zxL7+4N8saeGsKgPT8=; b=Y+ytCR/RN1AU99rdKhPOaOAZl9VhcecAgrKElupit0v1InGNScw/fxAL 86/Tnu52yR0DKKzX2a+hG/9AdrQw3eFdZ7JXCI34T+k1ssapy1rXiEsXf ARkUL1Wx236mkJ5llFeAA5YWC48/qnsoRC6KNtBBUuKjRyMi6vhwnbd8m s=;
X-Files: hgdieaig.png : 36033
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtAEAIkXuVStJssW/2dsb2JhbABagkUDgWiDBbNzhTWDPoRqh0QCgVYBAQEBAX2EAwkBAQEDAQUeVQEFCwsBAQEBFAUBAQEBFgsCAgIHAwIBAgEFAQ4xBgEMAQQBAgEBAg6IEAi9U5Q3AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF49eGweCaIFBAQSOBoM+AYYWhh6LbCKDbz0xAYJCAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,411,1418083200"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="314605173"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2015 13:53:44 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0GDrgRh012703; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:53:42 GMT
Message-ID: <54B917E6.8060201@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:53:42 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <54AC505B.8090802@nostrum.com> <8EFCB6B4-0D95-459E-A316-DB29C3945A33@cooperw.in> <54B58523.4070308@nostrum.com> <CABmDk8nHOEsVxz9bF-Y+Mgbj4DCEKPZoOgtP8Wp7vFBAUWcVmg@mail.gmail.com> <54B7F0AC.7000302@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <54B7F0AC.7000302@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080203010907050302060101"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/egzGVjNAP9UKzyt2DnF-5EP7Jss>
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:53:48 -0000

> On 1/15/2015 8:36 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>> IMHO, the workload issue could be much more effectively handled by
>> taking better advantage of directorates.
>
> +1   (well, really, +10)
And taking better advantage of the doc. shepherds, WG chairs, and WGs 
... basically, the entire community.

Coming back to the directorate, I'm proud of the OPS-DIR these days.

This really helps in terms of AD load.

Regards, Benoit