Re: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)

"John Levine" <> Wed, 24 February 2016 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F041B4173 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:34:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.363
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pf1W4lOFf6N3 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:34:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CC01B4171 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 99665 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2016 21:34:17 -0000
Received: from unknown ( by with QMQP; 24 Feb 2016 21:34:17 -0000
Date: 24 Feb 2016 21:33:55 -0000
Message-ID: <20160224213355.33998.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <>
Subject: Re: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:34:20 -0000

>While this is certainly expedient, it's quite open-ended, entirely
>left up to the judgment of the sitting IAB about what "reasonable
>modifications" might mean.  Certainly, with a by-law change that adds
>a board appointment, most anyone would consider it reasonable to just
>add that appointment with the appropriate periodicity, and it's
>reasonable not to have to rev this document for that.

ISOC has no plans to change the way the board is appointed, and if we
were tp do so, I'm sure the IAB and everyone else would have months if
not years of advance notice.  Is this really a problem that needs to
be solved now?