Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 30 October 2013 14:34 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7300E11E8242 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTD4jm18H5lo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D96511E8171 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id j1so1490696oag.39 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AnS7NXlHiObg7lZp08DQF8s7UJ5evBrzll4Zp8/Wbbg=; b=H+JMERmUb8S9czSX5tyrykXBlAf1zDeZG7qzY+4YUBbG5uGlQVyi2Y4zUMIg4KBrs6 F7g/FqpGjln4osViX8ywFI9KB/4gBYe6iTSlI6oO6Dxl1Avh2QWNkaGY299rGEbxRjbS sz9dsMoQ8N0N4+oTcPlU3joMvLIJAu3KeNbopa1K8tDXC71jOvFAP8irqrItzBg8x4j/ bONGjtOTqfHYkEaya+XRJtWSw5kCePbkTbhWKzQ0kHoze4bnDXaPlIHeNzsODXmO8pmn jSZ/Ioz2GWM5kQMFAMcPuiPG04DHvJ8i2yCR+mQ2bxtZeWg/lTSvMeSAtMxU0kunJ+l0 o9XQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBghwLJorPQaMIza5DpzPWTnhU+N5dyYcEXqn++yufr8Ad+4EncWpznoWuVU0Inyr0Mcct
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.143.103 with SMTP id sd7mr1434293obb.70.1383143655970; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.101.10 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <XyRGzVN6jOwk6F_vwEhe8OdueiPR8DgdnsPcWPmoKmbQ39LtU@smtp.gmail.com>
References: <3291AEDC-655D-4AD8-A60B-8D31A5C65DEA@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <7F135C08-A550-450F-82B4-1F239E115BC3@tzi.org> <87879E7D-A55B-4A88-80B8-B503C89E52CB@iab.org> <EMEW3|9e1becdb40bfbb97deb2f04c4b088de9p9YE8m03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|3291AEDC-655D-4AD8-A60B-8D31A5C65DEA@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <20131030081355.GA23990@nic.fr> <CAL02cgRyC=DdwCHgmnz1oEL+5CbUehi3jbcfGfjgqO_Nkx4j1A@mail.gmail.com> <XyRGzVN6jOwk6F_vwEhe8OdueiPR8DgdnsPcWPmoKmbQ39LtU@smtp.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:34:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRXBWom+0VGvqqEmw2NnBzu_wLcym1rLbAN7kLbg8tpSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ff1ce9e49adb804e9f63ae4"
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:34:20 -0000
This is why these tools have an option to set the date when computing future times. --Richard On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote: > Richard Barnes wrote: > I hope everyone in the IETF is familiar with sites such as: > <http://www.timeanddate.com/> > <http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/> > > > > > > Yes, but given we're in the throes of timezone mutilation for the purposes > of playing a longer game of golf, I'm not sure what the offset is, nor what > it will be by then. > > > > If you pick the translation into local now, for most folk in Europe, it'll > give you 1700. By Wednesday 6th November, it'll be 1800. I think. > > > > For UK folk, it'll be 1700. (Which I get by entering Vancouver as the > timezone in Google calendar). > > > > Did I mention I hate daylight savings time? > > > > Dave. > > — > > Dave Cridland -- Sent with Inky -- http://inky.com/ > > >
- IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was:… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Ross Finlayson
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Loa Andersson
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Tim Chown
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… ned+ietf
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Richard Barnes
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… IAB Chair
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Scott Brim
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Randy Bush
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Dave Cridland
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Richard Barnes
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… ned+ietf
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Tony Finch
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Cyrus Daboo
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Andrew Feren
- RE: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF must use only UTC in its anno… Warren Kumari
- RE: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… John Levine
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Vinayak Hegde
- Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… Vinayak Hegde
- RE: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (… l.wood