Re: Self-moderation

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799C63A1188 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=R5Sy+ZFp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Wj9LKFrm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MsPjtWTxEhq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3B63A1181 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 69245 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2020 20:58:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=10e7a.5f3aef89.k2008; bh=9+0oxtbWD4sjtj02RCKgKMyyEAUlZaNpFFFzsfNbudI=; b=R5Sy+ZFpd4Z3aataObovQfcW60001EJCq/VNF2dIGZAmjgmMNC5AgKS6do4k0W+AYpijjl9vD4YBWHp5MBnZtesMnQOkYs00kjAbvNCNRc5hgnXrg5M0231jIgJjhLCNy50zh4bRoQl1VYb8CuKCXPmr+JRKDCT39NGwh/xOWOeoLGmPb6MZdfBSAAZ3ZLg7XIR1URb01hyzUqHJbHdBxN7BzZqqTGEBWaUWF8LSlxWbP2mPatXpu1CmMTarv0zEzq0CiF8ZfnJtzOGkQ0Z5j7Rzs+NeNbhEL5lu3gIUb8rv5zAdwHIKTbRim+X1QhTDRethETsW1RTVWjBE6ZBZQg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=10e7a.5f3aef89.k2008; bh=9+0oxtbWD4sjtj02RCKgKMyyEAUlZaNpFFFzsfNbudI=; b=Wj9LKFrmjFCS0TMVm0sQVYiMiG/sYhUIs9M7anr0t07zKpF0on2XKe3yaY8NzfRtFLtYUdbQ3GiCm5D2wr73XIODEk3ZsHba6oSI03yXLUi8AWRKn4UhOLbQIoGg7TkDrPq5ovVGMJLbCGS/dXUSSKVIXKfTCEWm/kd+4jKDYyzVKHFBmCaKygcdZhWenf2Z+0Libxo072LSczRATjfHxhEteHg0XAhjh2gzC8EARyQo1u+Fb3u8wo5ayYj0aAsEZO1JmHnmYBNdWR7pacj8qK/zgKT5AEyaicwNNgiUciXyXjfU5NYy/60TE5aShcAd4PugxAD+SVe7sYS1hvbrBA==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 17 Aug 2020 20:58:49 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E67E61EE594C; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:58:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:58:48 -0400
Message-Id: <20200817205848.E67E61EE594C@ary.local>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com
Subject: Re: Self-moderation
In-Reply-To: <A5CE4192E3FE9B8606D89231@PSB>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/erd49OhWK-1H5xWpk3e7G-0Oe7k>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:58:54 -0000

In article <A5CE4192E3FE9B8606D89231@PSB> you write:
>That would take a different tool than one which produces a
>weekly summary.  It does suggest an idea -- especially in the
>context of your comments about people leaving the list.
>Perhaps if the mailing list system returned messages above, say,
>the fifth in an hour on a given thread or the tenth on a given
>list in 24 hours with a careful reminder and request for
>confirmation before the message was distributed, that might
>help. ...

Having been on lists that tried to do that, I can report that it
doesn't work. The people who most need to self-moderate are the ones
who say, yeah, sure, but this is IMPORTANT.

R's,
John