Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA34126CF9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 May 2018 20:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=K55EvoE3; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=qmiUivHl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bTw0RlIorFba for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 May 2018 20:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDC2E1250B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 May 2018 20:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 57108 invoked from network); 14 May 2018 03:18:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=df10.5af9001f.k1805; bh=DxXpdiWvS3gFSpRhaO/TMBIzwa/rGaQfND/o+Alagcw=; b=K55EvoE3L913EDPZZlN2qj1LRp5kmiLQR4X4XqlEImtBk/nAGhmZEvI034Z/KTf5MZwUD/6PG8rqBvq35PufKYK2jb+R6Sa6L2+toy6Df1/3qMS6xKv1syGdBFyv/DXfmcsl8PUFERq0wzAt0084owK8Pr5N0HRjNAGv/waL9WaL/tS7UVpxIpYsTb35+9qHCvJz9xN7o50qrvHvCYYFrCLgdgKYxbw3CNk6PEPJBkTFtTt8EzvDOQKaftWZiLjJ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=df10.5af9001f.k1805; bh=DxXpdiWvS3gFSpRhaO/TMBIzwa/rGaQfND/o+Alagcw=; b=qmiUivHlUVtNht1nNA78KltmWvlmJmvIvulHNI1vue81jVrD7BFCdwuLXqp08ZLb8Fzao2xKX5HkuBYymzrsztOY7HbZYW4MJ83Dl+Jxf1U0glxey/WcJcN2U3LePbuRIs3v5DNFBDGHHc/PO5kNqWmXN5yLKML8h6K4JWt6u+afkxhxXS7wjdcPPR7hPSzLmPXCJHLwj3jtyO2UQm/x0//M38J2/e6L9ROnTOXREUe/2zqvWAJHQ30Y+7+UYgbe
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 14 May 2018 03:18:55 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id ED51426858FB; Sun, 13 May 2018 23:18:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 13 May 2018 23:18:54 -0400
Message-Id: <20180514031854.ED51426858FB@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCq-27o7QjVfd8pES0Zi4zHaOs9uWh4eDR+L_Y4Os_JLg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/esAgGElbWPlsope2WVJx5J_x3Hw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 03:18:59 -0000

Those three RFCs are experimental, and RFC 6686 ended the experiment.
I'm not sure what if anything an historic experiment means.

I would suggest filing an erratum on 6686 so that it obsoletes
4405-4407 and leave it at that.  If we really want to make these three
historic, file a further erratum on 6686 which should have have said
so.

R's,
John


>> The IESG has received a request from DMARC WG to make the
>> following status changes:
>>
>> - RFC4405 from Experimental to Historic
>>     (SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible Submitter of an
>>     E-Mail Message)
>>
>> - RFC4406 from Experimental to Historic
>>     (Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail)
>>
>> - RFC4407 from Experimental to Historic
>>     (Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages)
>>
>> The supporting document for this request can be found here:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-change-sender-id-to-historic/