Re: New-comers

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 19 April 2021 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F183E3A42D9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXVymxfLzozZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5223A3A42D7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07C342783D; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen=40me.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New-comers
References: <0DEC3038-BF96-4E9A-AE80-0F3347D67AAB@me.com> <cd7c0b81-c245-ad9b-a1cc-bc923919d7a4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:31:26 -0700
In-Reply-To: <cd7c0b81-c245-ad9b-a1cc-bc923919d7a4@gmail.com> (Brian E. Carpenter's message of "Sat, 17 Apr 2021 09:14:15 +1200")
Message-ID: <ybl5z0ixbhd.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/esPLurghU94LUOrkOqFKWYBCvto>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:31:37 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> writes:

> All the same, my experience from both mentoring and newcomers'
> meet-and-greet is that most people first come because of a specific
> topic, which often (but not always) corresponds to a single WG.

>From the IETF guides perspective, when we go looking at applications
for people that want a guide: 1) yes there are some that are coming for
a particular topic and that's it, but 2) a decent percentage display
a wide range of interest and topics and even make statements indicating
their unsure where to start but are eager to get involved.  For the
percentage interested in multiple topics or just "generally", its
probably at least 25% of the guides applications.

> I may have said this before, but when I first attended an IETF meeting
> it didn't surprise me, because I was used to attending meetings of
> physicists. You need to be thick-skinned for that too. Has the IETF got
> more brutal over the years? I don't think so. That doesn't mean it's OK,
> but let's be clear that this is a long-standing problem.

The IETF may not have gotten worse, but I'd argue the rest of the venues
may have gotten nicer to attend and thus the gap is still wider.  Many
*OGs were much more aggressive internally than they are now (IMHO), as
an example.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI