Re: ISMS working group and charter problems

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:

>>The four I had in mind were TLSM, EUSM, SBSM, and SNMP/BEEP.  Prior to
>>the meeting the WG had ruled out the first three and during the meeting
>>the fourth was also shelved, leaving none.
> 
> 
> This does not match my recollection. My understanding was that the WG
> decided prior to the IETF-63 that it will follow the transport mapping
> security model (TMSM) approach, which was initially called "transport
> layer security model" (TLSM).

Which is the architectural model extracted from TLSM.

> Under the discussion during the IETF-63
> meeting were the selection of transport layer security protocols that
> could be used, such as TLS, SSH, DTLS, and BEEP. This is inline with
> what <draft-kaushik-isms-btsm-01> says:
> 
>    This document leverages the TMSM framework and describes the use of
>    the BEEP for securing SNMPv3.  This specification describes BEEP
>    Transport Mapping Security Model.
> 
> I don't think BEEP was even on the table when the discussions between
> EUSM, SBSM and TMSM was made - at least it is not mentioned in the
> evaluation document <draft-ietf-isms-proposal-comparison>.

Juergen asked that it be presented at IETF-63, which is why I included it.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf