IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative Procedures

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 05 April 2008 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8633A6936; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6523A6993 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.672
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.927, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjdHcCO1UnWE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2CC3A6936 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k40so311043wah.25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=epumTGZy+ps3ATvN5PzadJGJSPJvlQB8r4D4RAI9QKg=; b=QqKirhnrMIDfqkggQbHZhUpNiMSfCCor/Lr6txMZ8+7K7rdBZbbODlgrE9oLPuDQi7daeARFeRa0N4O+n3l39brTkecHmZETrr/M3iFH0vvx2e8sN2EGCxH3yWmJtm7+UvbNM1ICrOJibzOdZbbaPzqL72Q0KWjinAsKryyVBkY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s/Bdb6vSasZTIzjGoUBoE5dZZD2ZRT6gwfYbnFMug3WGff8ykExt+oEdNPFxOAKkgJOerDV1zoVzmQ7gWTO9rZYHfdI5oU9mNjJb9rO7iBj8v2t/b0znLbe/N9B6+RBYcWyy+MBbOtu3rRIL8qeW5v6nLQ9JKy8UZT4w9jSADbc=
Received: by 10.114.153.2 with SMTP id a2mr152301wae.198.1207366642130; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.1.1.4? ( [118.92.144.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m26sm8770615pof.6.2008.04.04.20.37.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <47F6F3EC.6070301@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:37:16 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative Procedures
References: <47F52D51.4030501@isoc.org> <47F5F9DF.4040706@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <47F5F9DF.4040706@alvestrand.no>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

-1. I think that given the pressure of work on our
volunteer "officials", we should allow load sharing
wherever it's feasible. We have running code here -
despite having the IAD's support and a volunteer
Secretary for the Trust, two successive IAOC chairs
have been overburdened.

   Brian

On 2008-04-04 22:50, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> After considering the comments so far, I think I disagree with having a 
> separate Trust chair.
> 
> The idea behind making the IAOC be the Trustees was, among other things, 
> to make sure that we didn't create yet another nexus of control in the 
> labyrinth of committees; I understood the legal existence of the 
> Trustees as something different (in name) from the IAOC to be strictly 
> something we did for legal purposes
> 
> If the IAOC chair is overburdened by having to manage the IAOC in two 
> different contexts, get him (or her) a secretary.
> 
> I agree with John's comment that leaving the current trustees in charge 
> on dissolution of the IAOC is inappropriate; for one thing, that also 
> removes all the recall mechanisms.
> Figure out something else to do in this case.
> 
>                            Harald
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> IETF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email