Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-15

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 01 February 2011 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595B03A6B58; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:28:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.799, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FiRKbXfTwZ24; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DAB3A6B07; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so7230658wwa.13 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=rdHpqHA2YZVxRjUpKk39INTaJTzST89lyxxfZB2QAgU=; b=P9jbpV33VhSyT8pp5uXSxXuhTDjgBDYLyJUF2SbY5ePcQURbxqTY7uc1E8a0E/Zpfq FBx5V2P9shEDCFBg4eBOJxJSreReJHcxIWVHhfi4SvPcxIIAbm/Y0LgwNAQiYcibaL4Q 3ruqcmCTepUT01mNjSJeSXUS58mGDyg/DGH7E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=Mu1gZCY5RbhzN17uycX37MUtatbCgNNcxi2WWZ3/FO+lkS8+fnJc3Ana/ZDudW7S0B 2rK24DbUtW05oOjpZd/m4rc8MqLHWocB0tI39RhbLD6jez4AWrA2eFXPtYYrcaB8Ccm+ MZOell52UQSrIHiJwMenKYVRYcrP2VK49EP+Q=
Received: by 10.216.78.146 with SMTP id g18mr7029003wee.1.1296549081093; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-183-9-180.red.bezeqint.net [79.183.9.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r38sm11301527weq.47.2011.02.01.00.31.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:31:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-15
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:27:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4d47c4d7.26ead80a.186e.4528@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01CBC1FA.9FC36A80"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcvB6doMMrQL3L4zQvuG+R35xXc7rA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:28:10 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

 

Document: draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-15

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2011-2-1

IETF LC End Date: 2011-2-10

IESG Telechat date:

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Informational RFC.

 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

1.       In section 8.2 the path exploration parameters are different from
RFC 5534, missing keep alive interval. Why the difference.

2.       In section 11.1 you discuss conflict resolution for SHIM6, is this
also relevant for HIP or is it a specific SHIM6 problem. This also relates
to the issue of conflict resolution discussed in the security section.

3.       The last sentence in appendix A "Any solution is needed to overcome
the problem mentioned above" is not clear, does it mean that there is no
solution to the context forking problem.  Section 11.1 claims that using the
procedure described it addresses this issue, am I missing something.

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

 

1.       In 8.2 for pe_keepaliveto, what are the units, I assume it is
seconds.

2.       In section 7 section paragraph "in which one ore" should be "in
which one or"