IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 23 January 2021 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4126F3A0D24 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:55:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9UQaoXBK-R7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:55:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD503A0D21 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AFB389A0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SqspRKvrsDlJ for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615913899F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CA6493 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:55:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
In-Reply-To: <CANMZLAZTOAfSkcTx8K=zfmM+YeUkiG3Ty99cbkoOygAQg16vcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <289B641E-F445-407F-9A7D-FCDEA9698F7C@akamai.com> <437bfe25-185c-4637-ae9a-59a6ccaade99@dogfood.fastmail.com> <BA07FAFAE7BBE5C47BCB7F58@PSB> <d9d77478-7b4f-4f04-98fa-4e3b99b78055@dogfood.fastmail.com> <f5d550e2-57e1-a682-53c4-d338086e7f32@pi.nu> <CANMZLAZTOAfSkcTx8K=zfmM+YeUkiG3Ty99cbkoOygAQg16vcg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:55:12 -0500
Message-ID: <29291.1611431712@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fEMiWwnS4mnnhRByPIWSXMZDK4Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 19:55:19 -0000

Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Agreed. The problem here is not whether incumbents are re-appointed,
    > but why the pool of candidates lacks diversity. This is not exactly a
    > new problem.

This is the list of candidates:
     https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/photos/

This is the input diversity.
Ask the current ADs why this isn't more diverse.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email