IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 07 July 2008 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B900D3A6ABF; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB513A6AB9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2-0mh0qI65X for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E393A683A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m67IdrY2001743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1215456002; x=1215542402; bh=renpFX2TMoWnj9zMsOUMQwYxYFLEh17ZFYcz 1H1X7ss=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=d/jelNL0aybV8qZVnVA6P/j0wNfZCdfD/S Nzb5bdGLFUm5s//6NRu+c3NNdXjqbkmttQOC8jXghHNNytwJjYQP/AVlDiHf9DOIoN8 /IIZtZKwWhfywSKH11Xj75Jd5XX+oqoaz6HTDm65es5dV4h2d6/5duEndUwvz16UtKM oSk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=a2yzXPBpDzan9/BfDdNYXsAfJsnfi2epXuJe2TdajpXQt3iF/KFs02SLQGHx13Y5E srylNUoR/c4v5ZLsaiDAVm7hbBSQ+ZaLjCCa8sNbnX3Me2R/ugoMpyCcEl04ruTmFIc n6yJ9DAfjKZrCBsBKLYvjF8Sk8GoS97wAVhO8iY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20080707105904.02c7d0c0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:34:06 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers
In-Reply-To: <200807071628.m67GSo8o007726@givry.fdupont.fr>
References: <Your message of Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:47:53 PDT. <20080703054752.GM6185@lark.songbird.com> <200807071628.m67GSo8o007726@givry.fdupont.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At 09:28 07-07-2008, Francis Dupont wrote:
>=> according to Glen via RT (RT is a well known bug ticket system):
>  "This check is in place at the direction of the IETF community, and has
>   been discussed and debated at length."

I don't recall seeing any community debate before this check was 
implemented.  Can someone point me to that thread?

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email