RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15

Lucy yong <> Fri, 06 January 2017 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8893612956C; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 07:46:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.321
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7UkN047dICzi; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 07:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92811294E7; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 07:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CYI75910; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:46:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 15:46:37 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 07:46:15 -0800
From: Lucy yong <>
To: Ralph Droms <>, "" <>
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15
Thread-Index: AQHSaB7GCvS+52eb70Osk9d2jP6NK6Erlc9Q
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:46:14 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D57B9CFF6@dfweml501-mbb>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.586FBBDE.03B3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 8baee53b376bdcced06fefbc457eb8d9
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:46:43 -0000

Hi Ralph,

Thank you for the review. We will have all acronyms expansion in next version and add a reference for DC services.  


-----Original Message-----
From: Gen-art [] On Behalf Of Ralph Droms
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 7:14 AM
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15

Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-??
Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review Date: 2017-01-06
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-11
IESG Telechat date: 2017-01-19

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 

I found several acronyms that did not have expansions.  I recommend a pass over the document for unexpanded acronyms..

Section 2: What is "broadcast/unknown" traffic (spec. "unknown"?); please expand the acronym "BUM".
  The paragraph that begins with "One NVO3 network [...]" is indented differently from the rest of the text.  Intentional or a typo?

Section 3.2: An illustrating figure for the use case described in this section would be helpful.
  Expand acronyms "PE" and "ABSR".
  I found the text using "Option A" and "Option B" confusing.  Exactly what are those options?

Section 5: I didn't understand the references to IaaS, PaaS and SaaS in the summary - there are no references to those services in the body of the document, or back pointers from the summary to relevant preceding text.

Gen-art mailing list