IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ietf@ietf.org is a failure

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 09 June 2013 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BBF21F8AF7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 03:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMKVrgPCEv0m for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 03:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0493721F88AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 03:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Uld4n-000PnC-OO; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:42:22 +0000
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:42:18 +0200
Message-ID: <m2sj0rsgz9.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Subject: Re: ietf@ietf.org is a failure
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHTjta3c-sEWv1bQAzVZbjSXfJfN3iaO1JkEtvM4Fh8Gyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201306070453.r574r3Wt010088@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <CADnDZ89FjyPtvJQSqY+kmX+1KYkc0jo1mRpOgkfcEnTH6Vbg6A@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA462@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <201306071449.r57EnN5N008971@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CABCOCHSkLj0409hyeqKNdomOdrScYypi_7a1xWqMEUV9eTPuCw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA801@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1306070901590.4180@egate.xpasc.com> <201306071651.r57Gp9Sf028501@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <7E35BCF0-B218-4A72-82E3-309320113D6A@gmail.com> <710CFEA093055148BDE84DEC@10.121.6.76> <6.2.5.6.2.20130608092332.0cb80b58@resistor.net> <51B38C47.5020602@gmail.com> <51B39224.1030808@gmail.com> <CABCOCHTjta3c-sEWv1bQAzVZbjSXfJfN3iaO1JkEtvM4Fh8Gyw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:42:26 -0000

> I'm not sure how the desire for IETF Last Call discussions to be on a
> dedicated and constrained mailing list

many years ago, a housing development thought they had a bad crime rate.
so they built a fence around it and only let residents in.  the crime
rate stayed the same.  funny thing.

procmail is your friend.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email