Re: Qualifying for NomCom

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AD312D613 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0QsrlU4GVF3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com (mail-vk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 831AA12D580 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e185so118267038vkb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=pNdGSG2rgIvnqqhvq4XWF2Ylpx4k0DOq2d4DHx+bgjo=; b=LIVSOURskGcyTxevGBmvOPNfTWQX9SHhRKy62Zd1zPNnbQzYNeILna8MdxttD7wnGe 9E4T5cJ88v6TmYvCLEclayOtOD2d22ujBnBPM2/qjjGfkWHWBNuYgQtC1YrLQa3kKFCI uHj2ZQVzmqLI4jW2j7YCIWtt2qrqBavdDbfBqRLNMDx7lrC4kmJLMlXSD2Sxuyge8jCb o+NtghLN0EE5+pyp680q6kUoAoNkoJrG3tlZiLmUR6ItVjNAJuys1ws6W9gHMsZo5Ymt hq3QGz/CPKgTQU16cpdqVt6M+CtoWVctw/4d4GLJf2BNM3/is+Yheg7gMR8c7QSFVsGF KTcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=pNdGSG2rgIvnqqhvq4XWF2Ylpx4k0DOq2d4DHx+bgjo=; b=mDIsuH65Jwqu0nnZ9L0btZJAVzncGc7FK5oFBbvuMn2JtjJN3qUb/3n/WMic55HyTL Oa+jrZM+rcdx2U/YZ69ECdJ0TmM5xFfpFo4AFiw+IH9ExPT2pPDytxd32dD/afvhItjc oIx30nDFRZj4KKC0CBSy/6/y6M2xH6jNlch7kE5TRSsfQGtiIS5nM6yJDVzeqNlfyvoW u7KqPzojdCsZRAu4hnenl/GeWYuoKsWS5LM/lzkJb6s9MQI/56T+yZtHQgGmTqqCmJOT 8T6vBa0OCbZzrlwNVOQLzI9Gc7msJzo4wkBvpxmDXMgqBKzvT9cc7Y/tvJ9nWM2f8tGZ fPKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLq4NpT3R7RoqEgdSQqC/LdyvJajfhY7m1t+bp5vW39Pwf8txm/5jXPHIlnIvh7Xh9B9avNxgeTXwQW1g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.176.64.169 with SMTP id i38mr2294973uad.154.1460069749644; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.49.139 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <60B61524-EFF7-4489-A0C7-AA4A139FEF6C@att.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqmC7NJyg2M6Na8vUj8T-qObO-1gHFEXZzrobb3oOQhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZHGa5OvSmZ=bTd6AWchsm4r=QaJn2nPqD+YjeWPmH9pA@mail.gmail.com> <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYvCpL9wwHL0E33HRbMvcckpad=gV-VYgAomJpCdiSrpg@mail.gmail.com> <5E36120B-6D4E-4C0D-9905-2C698455D395@att.com> <CAL0qLwak6GRDYAcYqdOewoSmRj6DP5ptQKjqXkOedBaHcKC7WA@mail.gmail.com> <60B61524-EFF7-4489-A0C7-AA4A139FEF6C@att.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:55:49 -0300
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYDW_zwfdr4-2=r0vt2Cb1wNFm+-aog0Wubu+8PbaYWEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c124588c66572052fecfa55
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fSKvqJ-8r4MVI_5_ZA1wlU3QIls>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:55:52 -0000

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:20 PM, HANSEN, TONY L <tony@att.com> wrote:

> No, outcome 1 says to use the criteria in section 2 directly as specified
> there. Outcome 4 lets us twiddle it.
>

Wouldn't we want to repeat the experiment with the twiddling before making
it part of the BCP?  That's outcome 2.

-MSK