Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sun, 28 February 2016 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F141A1DBE; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C3kFrqeE8Elg; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89BF21A1C06; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y9so100842746qgd.3; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=En/hISlssSVyIM+rIOxGCINMT2V66c1cFUJ02TH9tF4=; b=mF9HvGBEHb8BZl3cUFV4ZHfqbtz07KQ6W231ETNk+2kW5AoPAFMlcUM0jWDvHW3wpl H8vCIiXsdjFqBwcCqlAaEjXr879RblI3MYpBlM20KijR5Mdp/iTNIUx3hmGRMhIFbBvl 2IP5Gu/X8b/OHiA3ma3hH7S9jOhQGqtD1DMvwTeAgvdACx1AXy2StJbZtej//gxFe5Im nnj2YfioxiQRjZ8fCqDPCBIY1sUvUMKZYUkheWGjLGATR3iz+wdnQYL84sV0nZdihWN1 MHwCaqWcZNIduuDnHjb3tA+IZf/zV/qNZRP3WI25uVPfKZgEMG8fdfx39SRe76+8H+bJ 6wTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=En/hISlssSVyIM+rIOxGCINMT2V66c1cFUJ02TH9tF4=; b=YvGiswuLP73XEC10qKZvGvqOAPgRTDYvt5T+I0Pj/vbY9WAy762T4MgYlotauTmuzz HivW55Jc7cQ+DyajdFxp5gTBJfNagttPzfHr3VlwlJNhTnWuvj3PiCanFDx/6t0jotbX O7qDfH+T2HR9Z+15R4WLo+VXB8KxlSce6AX+MeFO61J0PzVSAjSq1IhlDtvqyAn9AScY AwhcbKov1nBrKEdXmwDKRAUMUmfSFCjPn9ovk/etGYz8EsHlVNd2VGK6qbMxBzDPDvg8 Nwne4MVo4vxnBPmREZPwc5EEiDOej6J28ONqSY337TddM1qb1fNB8I6ylOgm23FQaHrk KrLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKmtpECQ5YNulaaIH2nK0iEnTAb29Tz7J28tQO2QkLL1msy90ThmIFQT6hXgBwMgw==
X-Received: by 10.140.20.183 with SMTP id 52mr14277223qgj.38.1456675910436; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d00:abf0:7d39:ec64:74a7:7fe8? ([2601:647:4d00:abf0:7d39:ec64:74a7:7fe8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 139sm9177896qho.2.2016.02.28.08.11.47 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_18D07717-931F-45E0-841B-8A50242DEB7E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A49865510140628ADEB3DCB6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:11:44 -0800
Message-Id: <B5ECD878-81C0-42DE-9170-CAE0529402B6@gmail.com>
References: <20160224175935.21103.69618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVDpMsFuSMHPvkT2vXngGJkNsWDqL-g1EipcCUNjqa2Ssg@mail.gmail.com> <56CDFF39.7000603@gmail.com> <4572E392-3E57-45C4-9CBF-86B3E2E0982A@cisco.com> <CALaySJJfyikA7o5CEiQvbjNF-d7EzUi-TTsTWnxo2yb_jBibag@mail.gmail.com> <56CE6E2B.6020903@gmail.com> <6CB3AE29-C0DD-45B3-858C-2C3A44106ED5@gmail.com> <56D1FDD2.5030906@gmail.com> <CAC4RtVDvN8fF4ZAH3-2MA4h3FTbUd37NQsy484eoCXy5MBhoGA@mail.gmail.com> <A49865510140628ADEB3DCB6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fT9w3z1xOiYoUj-dfkloxuQO82M>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org, IAB <iab@iab.org>, "Joe Hildebrand \(jhildebr\)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:11:56 -0000

> On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:39 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> --On Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:35 -0800 Barry Leiba
> <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>>> NEW:
>>>   If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the
>>>   number of IETF appointments to the ISOC Board or the
>>>   timing thereof, the IAB may make corresponding
>>>   modifications to the frequency and the timing of the
>>>   processes embodied in this document, pending any
>>>   modification to this document. Such changes will be
>>>   announced via an IAB statement.
>> 
>> I think a change such as that would be good.
> 
> I agree but, if the intent is that the IAB modifications and
> statement are a stopgap, to avoid discontinuities, etc., but
> that the IAB is still expected to move expeditiously to get the
> BCP updated, that could be said a lot more clearly.

I agree.  The IAB shouldn’t delay it’s board appointment until this document is updated, but it should do an update in a reasonable amount of time.

Thanks,
Bob