Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 06 November 2007 08:35 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpJuU-0003U0-9f; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:35:46 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpJuS-0003TC-Gy for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:35:44 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpJuO-0003NT-Pr for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:35:44 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext13.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id lA68ZLqp009344; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:35:34 +0200
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:35:34 +0200
Received: from mgw-int02.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.97]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:35:33 +0200
Received: from [172.21.35.2] (esdhcp0352.research.nokia.com [172.21.35.2]) by mgw-int02.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id lA68ZWFx026592; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:35:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <472FB07F.7030401@gmail.com>
References: <E1Ip924-0002IB-7X@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <fgo5r7$ejk$1@ger.gmane.org> <472FB07F.7030401@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Message-Id: <E1C4E062-312A-42C7-A63B-C439DA970B7E@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:35:28 +0200
To: ext Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2007 08:35:33.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF533ED0:01C8204F]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Cc: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0317640677=="
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 2007-11-6, at 2:08, ext Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Red herring as far as this draft is concerned: I'd be interested
> to know why we are still willing to allow non-disclosure for
> port numbers (see RFC 2780 sections 8 and 9.1). Port numbers
> are going fast.

We've recently been discussing port number allocation procedures with  
IANA, and changes may be coming.

Lars
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf