Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 03 March 2013 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA59221F8615 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 01:16:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.563, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gARIVgc1+xbr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 01:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7E321F85EE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 01:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.17]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MHJXh-1Ty4nZ01D9-00E1u4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:16:02 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Mar 2013 09:16:01 -0000
Received: from a88-115-219-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.100]) [88.115.219.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 03 Mar 2013 10:16:01 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX194XdpbpFt4PT5JBbfw1sqEls1PN6fZFiqoPahdsS SiZyNZdlG8hW7+
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <51330179.3040500@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:15:57 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <919840EE-BEC8-4F82-8D3C-B116698A4262@gmx.net>
References: <21B86E13-B8DA-4119-BBB1-B5EE6D2B5C1D@ietf.org> <51330179.3040500@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 09:16:11 -0000

Brian, you are essentially saying that the Nomcom should "ignore the requirements". 

I believe we would attract more candidates right from the beginning if we lower the requirements.

The transport area has historically had a this strong emphasis on congestion control expertise for at least one of the serving transport ADs and this requirement seems to reduce the pool of available candidates quite severely. 

Ciao
Hannes

On Mar 3, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 03/03/2013 05:00, IETF Chair wrote:
> ...
>> advance.  Since this discussion could lead to a change in the IESG
>> requirements, the IESG encourages the community to take part in this
>> discussion so that any changes are based on broad community input.
> 
> When there is a choice between nominating nobody, and nominating someone
> with excellent IETF experience and management skills, but who is not a
> recognised specialist in the narrow technical area concerned, I believe
> that standing advice to the NomCom should be to appoint such a candidate.
> 
> Also the standing advice to the confirming body should be to confirm
> such a nominee.
> 
> We are too hung up on our narrow specialisations in the IETF.
> 
>   Brian