Re: [103all] Visas for IETF 103 in Thailand

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 15 August 2018 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D4D130F1D; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRGlJDm6J8rs; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A2DE130F66; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w7FJfILg008107; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:41:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.114] (p54A6C84F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.200.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41rKb24X1CzDX6T; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:41:18 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: [103all] Visas for IETF 103 in Thailand
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808152107280.19688@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:41:17 +0200
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, 103all@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 556054876.4661289-24395a58527f9148f86b4b670c587253
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12FAA236-A1E3-4550-AE8E-0638DD40BAFD@tzi.org>
References: <153426794535.27168.17582506604424633822.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=duU0ijWy8hxRdDE0arC1MhBZwSt=YQSkC-bfZX8ySH5BqSw@mail.gmail.com> <20180814194722.GA16126@mx4.yitter.info> <C0533504-4EE0-44CB-AD42-7C5F1051AC2A@tzi.org> <41103334-DDAD-451F-AED4-9D268D907372@gmail.com> <CABmDk8kGx4OpT3Gz6XJDO3MrRLUW1MRBxx1Y=xv7QvzPTvKUUA@mail.gmail.com> <4168435F-AFE4-4449-A199-4026EE242E01@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808152107280.19688@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fhuhKHz4l-CJqBp11_y0DvMt2sY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:41:25 -0000

On Aug 15, 2018, at 21:18, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> "1.     Foreign nationals wishing to enter the Kingdom of Thailand to attend a MICE event, which is endorsed or sponsored by TCEB, without being employed or working for income, are regarded as tourists”

Thanks Mikael for this find — that is exactly what I was asking for.
That is the kind of information the secretariat/meeting organization should collect and make available.
(And make sure we are endorsed/sponsored by the TCEB — are we?)

> Having spent a total of over a year and traveled in and out of thailand a non-trivial amount of time, I'd recommend to make things easier for everybody and just say you're going there for tourism if you're a passport holder from one of those 55 countries. If someone questions that, point to above rule and say you interpreted it as you should say tourism. Apologise profusely for the mix-up.

Let me tell a story about this: There is a check box on a US visa waiver form that asks “have you ever had a visa canceled?”.

Now, I started going to the US regularly when Germans still needed visa, and at the time I was too young for a permanent one, so I got one that lasted only a couple of years.  Later, when I went for a trip that might have gone beyond the end date of that visa, I finally got a permanent one, and my time-limited one (which was still valid for a couple more months) was canceled.  Some time later, when the visa waiver program became active, at first I continued to travel with my permanent visa, until one day an immigration officer just wrote a big “canceled” on top of that (I must have let out a big gasp) and said I didn’t need that any more.

OK, so the next time I entered, I did have to use the visa waiver program, and I dutifully put my check mark for “have you ever had a visa canceled” on the true answer: Yes (actually, by then I had that happen twice to me).  Of course, I turned up in “that room” after briefly talking to the usual immigration officer.  After about two hours later, an immigration officer told me off in no uncertain terms to never make that check mark in the check box again and sent me on to my meeting.

How should I have known that the expected answer to that question was not the truth, but the expedient answer?
That was a highly learnable moment.

Grüße, Carsten