Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Thu, 22 May 2025 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7032C011FC; Thu, 22 May 2025 12:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8HWVUl6048v; Thu, 22 May 2025 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2472C011EE; Thu, 22 May 2025 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1747943721; bh=TnUjk2pXJjO+TFiBubiK7d5XhndH7cGR7Sj2m/tckyo=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mAf8DzNHAeWjbl3IsYIOpdpFPshWwDaog1DS8ZLdBeg9Z63dHgFAeMVKR0VkUCYz8 GTGZg0LFzF15r7l+1hdMLjedDH8DBbHa+ZP9NUiIBPqvi0+hgfbie6YZ8F1xOpGngA H72Pzdp+CclQIbb2L5f7JjMAvmB6A2l15yqxQT/Y=
Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:d411:ae00:1aed:47f9] (0.1.2.1.2.0.a.2.dynamic.cust.swisscom.net [IPv6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:d411:ae00:1aed:47f9] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-2) with ESMTPSA id 54MJtLfP2276753 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 May 2025 21:55:21 +0200
Message-ID: <30493a61-57b6-4155-9d8e-d2ba82724ca2@lear.ch>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 21:55:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
To: IETF Executive Director <exec-director@ietf.org>
References: <0E13A03E-3B81-4C9C-976E-B8C68810B486@ietf.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Autocrypt: addr=lear@lear.ch; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNGUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAbGVhci5jaD7CwI4EEwECADgCGwMCHgECF4AWIQSY0L2Q Rh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M8KI B/46pFrJX+4Ockl2fHR303ais9Lyx8jv6mXKKOr8WR0UYcJ0syQrhaaZNG1VV98tYQHHK9F5 y7hH4YCsrr3odZ6zoavnx5X1X/2xw8y732f/irVoOOkYLid9IGPxa2e2nYXCZpde5/yvv3we XVE4mG4dEAD5T8iKS4Hz/3fKGJQ15o79Jv92HgC7RpCt0WaiQ0b6acP3PuwjDJzJzLFZzb7j IiB3izxQESSWE1GNRmoAK/k0gW6kmx1/87tQENrK+3Nn4CJSFQWF6entLnY7UeVm95wbMQkJ evwddDWUO2huDbmZnmxgKXGzSSpuNq7n8ICAOlbt0HfdJAZQfy25bwvezsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0 WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Macj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGo HOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExdd qV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcYY/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5c HUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU+tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypu cGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkF AlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c62pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHS iXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnXHXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGw f2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycjPAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoA MjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPFOmDhJSmH55HLAky2Mlmq JYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNR zGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
In-Reply-To: <0E13A03E-3B81-4C9C-976E-B8C68810B486@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------cuAcD9kDg2ajkVfDDktk06UH"
Message-ID-Hash: SOLP3RBFGV5NGMDQ5EZKTSNIGUHJXXJE
X-Message-ID-Hash: SOLP3RBFGV5NGMDQ5EZKTSNIGUHJXXJE
X-MailFrom: lear@lear.ch
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IETF List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fmP5uQJr62enQDa4egRnUSHMCog>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Jay, I realize the LLC has a difficult choice, but I am shocked and dismayed by this decision. The federal government of the United States is paralyzed in all constructive ways, but not in their attacks on immigrants and trans people. It was reported in the New York Times yesterday that the FDA will highly restrict access to COVID vaccines, risking epidemics throughout the US. My in-person attendance would risk either direct harm to me, my loved ones, and friends, and it would marginalize those I care about. I will not attend. Eliot On 22.05.2025 21:38, IETF Executive Director wrote: > At its annual onsite retreat held in Amsterdam 6-7 May 2025, the IETF Administration LLC Board reviewed its decision to hold IETF 127, 14-20 November 2026, in San Francisco, USA. This follows on from a series of events with the most recent being the board meeting on 16 April 2025 where the board considered the responses to its call for feedback [1] and received direct feedback from a number of IETF participants. We received a lot of constructive and diverse responses and we understand the various concerns raised. > > The board has reached a final decision that IETF 127 will go ahead in San Francisco as planned. > > In reaching this decision, the board reassessed this meeting with regards to the requirements of BCP 226 [2] and concluded that it remains consistent with the criteria in the BCP. It also considered the viability of the meeting and concluded that there will be sufficient participation for the meeting to be financially viable and to meet the threshold set by the IESG for a technically viable meeting [3]. > > The board sincerely thanks all of those that have provided feedback on this complex issue. > > [1]https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/STQXuEgpsJp8JJ0SRh1OghDb2XY/ > [2]https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp226 > [3]https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Vmsojml9ghvSFbxNrDB9EU5KwNg/ >
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jeffrey Walton
- Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment S Moonesamy
- Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Rob Sayre
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment IETF Executive Director
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Corinne Cath
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment John Levine
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie