IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 03 June 2015 02:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723821A92F5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HL4SLflHteUx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223571AD34F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2C320697; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZXHv8fhKVMbV; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-73-159-4-174.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.159.4.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id CADEC81BCD; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?
References: <20150601164359.29999.35343.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <tsllhg3t0ya.fsf_-_@mit.edu> <51432A40-FAC0-4D04-8CD5-20C56DC25FDD@frobbit.se> <2036457.vXnxjqSTLC@gongo> <20150603015444.32B952FD573D@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 22:23:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150603015444.32B952FD573D@rock.dv.isc.org> (Mark Andrews's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:54:43 +1000")
Message-ID: <tslk2vlsf7b.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/foZCwReNDLBa2hUu8UJaBbeSvSI>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 02:23:10 -0000

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> writes:


to be clear, none of this is the sort of thing I was looking for.  All
of this is discussions of parts of the Internet that aren't particularly
transparent or interested in letting you have open access to large
portions of the net.
I don't care if the ietf website is accessible from a hotel before you
accept the network's terms.

Based on the discussion so far I'd like to see better justification for
the claim that there are portions of the network that block TLS before
we make it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email