Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

Jim Fenton <> Wed, 14 April 2021 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B53A19C3 for <>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WemWVvYfVxQG for <>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a994::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74273A19C2 for <>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=supersize; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bgIzR7jUxqjNzaEB2+NC0cwe6IpsgxVdvr/zwydV5k8=; b=pO5uaple97dgE9xxOLO7QXF41o O3hsT0zvj/G8VfQ+Wk7MoZNh9XPB4uM1Uk0rlpfhLJxJ/LE0f66xRUcMA1UyoDAYJbhTqIhNWXUIf g2TAgeDvTiq6Wm8mbXQfCesHXa9O+mTLuZHX4ttdEc3riKBKZeBIWLztDRgLLFepkxXY=;
Received: from [2601:647:4400:1261:b538:335d:f895:1804] (helo=[]) by with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <>) id 1lWjpr-0006Ny-JO; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:01:55 -0700
From: "Jim Fenton" <>
To: "Eliot Lear" <>
Cc: "The IETF List" <>
Subject: Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:01:55 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <20210413200535.BF29C72D2919@ary.qy> <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:02:02 -0000

On 14 Apr 2021, at 10:33, Eliot Lear wrote:

> What does this mean to the IETF?  I don’t think it means “stop 
> doing TERM”.  Rather I think it means that we should work on the 
> other aspects.  We should make it easy and fun to be here.  And mostly 
> it is fun (of course I’m biased), but sometimes it’s not easy.

The question I keep asking myself (and I don’t have an answer) is 
whether by focusing on terminology in this way we are distracting 
ourselves from making more meaningful efforts to make IETF more 
inclusive. I don’t know what those more meaningful efforts might be, 
but I hope we’re addressing the big problems first.