IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Confidentiality notices on email messages

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Sat, 16 July 2011 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E69721F89A7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.927
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.927 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.328, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E98H38ewliK5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5A421F8987 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:09:09 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:09:08 -0700
Subject: RE: Confidentiality notices on email messages
Thread-Topic: Confidentiality notices on email messages
Thread-Index: AcxCVWUsDEn5zdfpRH+NTdnvyS9atQA9w8RA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134EBC4D4B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <CAC4RtVBGgk74VMEty9u5Yq+DFy=oR5tOnbZ3R5x83Gyee6mRNw@mail.gmail.com> <29987.1310565058@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4E1DCA13.9030301@acm.org> <04AE56F0C4CE8168D1B38D59@PST.JCK.COM> <p0624066dca44df0ca50f@loud.pensive.org> <49A68144182BB270C11BC841@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <49A68144182BB270C11BC841@PST.JCK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:09:10 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John C Klensin
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:39 AM
> To: Randall Gellens; Marc Petit-Huguenin
> Cc: IETF discussion list
> Subject: Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
> 
> If one starts down that path, there is a real possibility for a
> semantically-rich environment.  For example, consider a noise
> type for flaming, repetitive, responses to a topic on the IETF
> list.  One could also very efficiently reflect what I assume was
> the intent of a recent observation on the list with
> noise-type="hitler" :-(

The trick though, alas, is to get people using such disclaimers to begin using such a media type.

Maybe we need an attractive acronym for NOISE as a decoy.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email