IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Tue, 14 March 2017 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFCC12952D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecs.soton.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tu8FhD1fiO9k for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B690129524 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2E9jv52012352; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:45:57 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk v2E9jv52012352
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1489484757; bh=BXbOAVjM0DiS0w6KRVLjuu6kS/A=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=IOaxMDH90GUdh9M/JxwRkkeQ/2AGBdbA6iflEOUl1MvL3CSeU8UvBAIYqK6VdHJiS KlTJhyILtWUAJFeOMQvV24JZ0NxPQCl5q1R9FIbrsL1zDItWQlKGCp/D68Todszh1N +xzFsozOWE7gDNIEvgBSZ+nmHu40lqZolznWS3kE=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id y2D9jv1720202511Ym ret-id none; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:45:57 +0000
Received: from [10.1.11.164] (firewall-lho-ext.management.janet.ac.uk [194.82.140.195]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2E9jolr032199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:45:51 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703141010060.59120@ary.local>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:45:50 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|bba7f5bce4739a47add3b4c2dd47ad62y2D9jv03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|DA187B92-0D87-4D6F-9E4E-CC921277AB42@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703132331590.54839@ary.local> <A373006B-DB4F-468A-A3D1-0ED07BD98B35@puck.nether.net> <CAMm+LwgME0QjqYN65a5+Arv4DH=-=pnNLPT65TKYKM4cm=7WsA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703140839430.58560@ary.local> <6006F740-4688-486E-84DF-FA676DDBCA00@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|2ae60e4618a4ca12f14a455f9eb23ec6y2D8s103tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|6006F740-4688-486E-84DF-FA676DDBCA00@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703141010060.59120@ary.local> <DA187B92-0D87-4D6F-9E4E-CC921277AB42@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=y2D9jv172020251100; tid=y2D9jv1720202511Ym; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=2:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: v2E9jv52012352
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/g-GmoH_cXbT1ThBiQhMgF0sPS_M>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:46:01 -0000

> On 14 Mar 2017, at 09:43, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>> I do think though that we could probably make it clearer somewhere ‘official’ what the issues are for people signing up to our lists, e.g. perhaps at https://www.ietf.org/list/ <https://www.ietf.org/list/>.  I had a quick look and couldn’t see anything obvious there.
> 
> Once again, these complaints had nothing to do with our lists or anyone else's.  Carsten was complaining about sending mail to NIST, Philip about sending mail to Gmail.

But a bit of awareness raising can’t hurt, can it?  And if we had the issue documented on an IETF page, it’s then easy to point people to that link rather than rehash the explanations.

Tim

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status