Re: IETF and open source license compatibility

TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net> Thu, 12 February 2009 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBACF28C20E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.128, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pRtUbsZ6KdO4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55C528C226 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:30 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=f5U94FCsJ0PVTcEJS2LLU1tcnQwHMf5r9G/iH0CokMXx0shUUFbsxnR8LpLjCERn; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.133.66] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1LXioO-0002c4-Cz; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:09:32 -0500
Message-ID: <49949010.5050306@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:36 -0800
From: TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Subject: Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
References: <87bpt9ou7d.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <C5B8BAE5.30347%stewe@stewe.org> <87k57vlwfu.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <49941899.5010506@piuha.net> <alpine.LSU.2.00.0902121243481.4546@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <499447D1.6060600@alvestrand.no> <49945B7A.60603@piuha.net> <87iqnfjsq3.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
In-Reply-To: <87iqnfjsq3.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec799b7676d19a79ac74188b3f4726724ff8350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.133.66
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:09:31 -0000

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> writes:
>
>   
>> Harald, Margaret, and Simon,
>>
>> Harald wrote
>>     
>>> actually that's intended to be permitted by RFC 5377 section 4.2:
>>>       
>> and Margaret wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> However, I don't think that anyone actually believes that the IETF
>>> will track down people who copy RFC text into comments and sue them
>>> or attempt to get injunctions against them.
>>>
>>> (2) Even if the IETF did try to sue you for copying sections of RFC
>>> text into your source code comments, they'd almost certainly lose
>>>       
>> So it seems that we actually do have at least some ability to deal
>> with comment-style use of RFCs fragments in free software. Simon, do
>> you see any residual issues that we need to solve, or were your
>> concerns in areas other than comments?
>>     
>
> The discussion started by Stephan suggesting that free software authors
> publish their work as free standards in the IETF.  My point was that
> since the IETF disallow publishing standards under a license that is
> compatible with free software licensing (e.g., allows modification), it
> is not possible for free software authors to do this.  Thus, to me, this
> discussion is not related to comments in source code at all.
>   
So then just create another IETF Standard for Open Source Licensing.
> /Simon
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>