Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 20:42 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C7211E832A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYxQwbqajhRw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22b.google.com (mail-pd0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F54621E8099 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z10so11005083pdj.16 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TgMBJTKBqvx+pNcRgaUOLN88Nd78NK2hdIWcC6r4CJg=; b=CL2HslzSunaEjlWpNom0/smQ7uklrRsCQxI05dZsOlQHXFmOFHCDID1UiBqJU7JkT8 B/Tj2apD/ZpKIfx4w/KTMaBt9IwRBuQ6zgGW+FecmBvxRvdYQ6wlwCisObiSbjjueFaA KxlMUzbod05eFqQAP9LHX1CDvWCm4w9TDwHN4ZAFgc/R+th5BdhPDYwfngvJ8P6U9pBQ wR5HVuUNKhBNeOQaQuqKJ0UIWIAyy7Z8QZSfwbkllOzdc3+pOJcG18zAsPEU+aVOXwg1 ZHIxdVhW/erXzCXs72BjS3jETvQZAGwPjA67Ivc9sdzVpci2uEnwqkA/Lz2vZY6zYpez uLzg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.165.106 with SMTP id yx10mr9005047pab.159.1382474403868; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.69.8.5 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <61EE8145-2184-44C1-8163-424F97F8286C@piuha.net>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com> <m21u3d5zvo.wl%randy@psg.com> <5266B4A4.9020301@dcrocker.net> <5266C6CA.30900@gmail.com> <0B5A250AE70FD6B21DD3CF4C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5266CE7C.2020503@gmail.com> <61EE8145-2184-44C1-8163-424F97F8286C@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:40:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88ZaSU=VR6-xCR5vEWXJX=VzMg9a0m7owQP5CbGeu_-RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86c342c0f5f104e95a6750"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:42:09 -0000
> > > As I noticed that f2f meetings should present their name before talking so it is good no anonymous talks. I think there is a hidden problem in anonymous posting, how can I network with someone I cannot trust because he/she does not trust participants by sharing identity. I post with a known name but get some participants discredits me with that name (a reason why some people hide real names), so they taking things to personal or trying to make poster become change to anonymous or become with no trust of the IETF system. All should respect others, so we can work together with more trust. I am against IETF allowing workers becoming anonymous because no one will trust it or even follow it. I started to be afraid that most IETF management or participants or authors may have registered without their real name. An anonymous poster should go through a process with a known participant to proof that he/she is not attacking the system. That participant may sponsor the anonymous poster to enable the continue of anonymous remote participation. AB
- Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.ca… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Techno CAT
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Donald Eastlake
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Anonymous postings SM
- RE: Anonymous postings l.wood
- Re: Anonymous postings Melinda Shore
- Re: Anonymous postings Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Anonymous postings Melinda Shore
- RE: Anonymous postings SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Barry Leiba
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- IETF::ISOC (was Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John C Klensin
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Scott Brim
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jari Arkko
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Thomas Narten
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John C Klensin
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… l.wood
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Christian Huitema
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… joel jaeggli
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Scott Brim
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Richard Shockey
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Douglas Otis
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… ned+ietf
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John Levine
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… David Conrad
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- On anonymity.... (was: Sergeant at arms: please d… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Douglas Otis
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dan Harkins
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… TSG - personal
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon