IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 03 April 2014 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A4F1A0413 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osF2_SqRa6EN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA5A1A000D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1WVV6T-0008hg-UE; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:01:57 -0400
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:01:52 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Clint Chaplin <clint.chaplin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
Message-ID: <BC2AAC258726307E193F95F0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <F11C2722-7821-4BBB-B6ED-6B8F20A978AB@nominum.com>
References: <20140401220040.F06667FC394@rfc-editor.org> <CADn-GthSGvG9SOtE7sfzsbtS0SyXHO6xOKXYZHgzDjYux+tYcQ@mail.gmail.com> <F11C2722-7821-4BBB-B6ED-6B8F20A978AB@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.115
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/g6ygAok47MQ0l9YVuDuVnZLYvag
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, ietf@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:02:33 -0000

--On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 19:42 -0400 Ted Lemon
<ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:54 PM, Clint Chaplin
> <clint.chaplin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Will there be an option for not-tea?
> 
> No.   You can't have tea and not-tea.

At least until you answer the question "when is tea not tea" in
a satisfactory way.  For example, the stuff that comes
identified as tea but arrives in bags in many bad restaurants
(and others that should know better), is pretty clearly not tea
but it is less clear whether it is not-tea or not.

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status