IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E2411E8089 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kDM91fQbf7R for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0332011E8098 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1SMowS-000D8C-4w; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:14:40 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:19:37 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Robin Uyeshiro <uyeshiro@IfA.Hawaii.Edu>, mrex@sap.com, 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Message-ID: <747A174C9AEE4BE60CDDBA77@JCK-EEE10>
In-Reply-To: <A656E37B86744E09AF5BEC66136F5273@XeonAL>
References: <A656E37B86744E09AF5BEC66136F5273@XeonAL>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:19:42 -0000

--On Tuesday, 24 April, 2012 11:52 -1000 Robin Uyeshiro
<uyeshiro@IfA.Hawaii.Edu> wrote:
 
> <snip>
> The issue with John's purpose is that he is taking a picture
> of the audience(!), and if you take such a picture from the
> front in a small meeting room, there might a small number of
> folks end up _prominently_ in the foreground of that picture,
> at which point their consent will be required.

Again, IANAL and I don't think you are either, so I don't want
to argue "prominently" versus "non-prominently".  I can assure
that, when pictures were used, the clear intent was the everyone
with his or her hand up was individually identifiable and almost
everyone else was too.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email