Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 18 April 2021 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF443A1755 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 06:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sa8u23OXoUqK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4BBF3A1748 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2755C0183 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:11:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:11:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=f+AYZdByOki23KArjrPowqaLCYe17oABEg+6vS1YS as=; b=hyQZSq9So1qSTY8looDy1hRtXNAdiQvvJeV6o6oBvv/IU3DKGMoPkYsUJ LJIbBN3dxfFD51wcVAMa+TdB3HRaqXcXtM7eZ9KFhVDKnXwOgvpxC+HfQmUmyU8G cpKM9bIPTenjacHPTP7Ls2M6XO0wW5b1uzdHE/f95SMUOPNeVwVVTYruCHH9mEbN WUQQuR7J3izdf/GVz3T0zHcUQ4R1vvRQHAGjaer2zke2D/vnCnvoHmXkxpQEmjzq hnFI6BAp9xo2jXwvVDfV4D5/kB7k/lKn5cu6k/6mvqNK4bEof/U1dSK6vho0w7AU v5uTM7/W4YhlF690qTwP0AtF3+LKg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:FTB8YI4VpMrJ14EQMXHj3mub6l19pHkZAqbrw_llaPZyubS_CeTWPg> <xme:FTB8YJ7dGP4O3cUcpXNs-ewOl8h-laDk9t_hABUM-w0N-30x7GnZxTrsaK7mk98Kh OoRLiaT3Ci3hw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelledgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdeggfelue elkeeuhfffheeghffhkeeuvdduudeihfehudefffdtgfdtkeffgfenucfkphepjeefrddu udefrdduieelrdeiudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:FTB8YHeoutD_cSR78hT5moF5urDjUbE3BQLYFGzUSpbtBV_NBx5h2A> <xmx:FTB8YNIQbFcDQVjnVdLRQRLu4rmcH0KaeUUzfQDTePMUmpl_SUW7wg> <xmx:FTB8YMKZ-ylX-nxqRmGDQFQ_s12Eb0nl4nX63aD3CIMbw_egKqstbQ> <xmx:FjB8YLa2r3VhiZKUBqfGPOuRDHp-QbrOIDIVRJANmyO73fhuNdXMsg>
Received: from [192.168.30.202] (c-73-113-169-61.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [73.113.169.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA3A1240057 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:11:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <cdaf3837-05f5-a260-d99c-6858eb087d28@network-heretics.com> <C8DF0047-9783-434F-A8E3-80CA27129F14@yahoo.co.uk> <1623472249.5141806.1618728300270@mail.yahoo.com> <649297164.5194905.1618742246097@mail.yahoo.com> <1084449815.5209238.1618742553057@mail.yahoo.com> <585949916.765282.1618748029732@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <40c30b00-7827-98f9-ab34-d30012fb089e@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:11:48 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <585949916.765282.1618748029732@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gDyoblI02zzXMsp57qgVDz5_0qw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 13:11:56 -0000

On 4/18/21 8:13 AM, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

<<prototype of "polite" form letter>>

Yeah, I'd much rather be snarled at than get one of these.

Keith