IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Enough is Enough.

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE3E3A11CF; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPblS1OVmuLE; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCEF3A12AC; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw13.schlund.de ([10.72.72.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LyFyl-1kPMvZ2EBZ-015YFm; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:21:56 +0200
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:21:56 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "legal@ietf.org" <legal@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2037330577.69890.1603214516438@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB028587C3EBD5F3B842444C24AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1244503240.69594.1603213781185@email.ionos.com> <VI1P194MB028587C3EBD5F3B842444C24AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Subject: RE: Enough is Enough.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev23
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:NxTlcVjI/HQr5S8xyblNPDfM0jFKhWS61wE1OYnioHzZ+9NHMcD +pjGtMyjjkhkHXLlUoc0nFw0lMqGGx3lephZu42/tG1XUgenkocAYAN+KhUQrfeSzuSvwwF +UA9jdNPzRTdJiPD/vmYqNxGtvtDbIJ6NASiFcxowPcte+V5YfnNYu6zfkrvvLNSFEtXIYF noHTIQZrFaL0O8FmLdB4w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:DhnMPb2rWyg=:sK1tQSyTR3A+UqYTgtqXKY 4mKRuUxg5yJsTeOj9YgclZ7EdYXr904GKxfQaDS86d1rekiXarixataJ3t7FiGZdcEhJPOHWp xb1UDa0PIBRnMAwYuER477ozL15DmkaLYXwSI7T0mdK9+F8iVR6Eqiy1qcYzo6uLNztxWrfJe LSR2PH7wCbwZCvF0iQs5yK6Z4dKeTLswbYOaexjVyn5EMx6IYb0qxzJ5G2vKkSarrm2wyCGrn M1ZqxJogG3TSrSD4c67mtGe8NX4yn9mEN+q7pBDhm8BLeMbYUfs9cfhyc6kP3wuNB8cmnlEbc K3f5ihmFDSTZrJXMbVK9ZvJTq2/7jGmc2lyba1f+t3/UqYPCADiDDTMTfqmQ2hd3l0bdVosc7 yI+r5ieEUa/pG5p7vg0SQ4W/OdSlZjhqf8kra6e3RU72PSzSwKYduZaiKlNJ9DTS7JjA3ULyn FBAokSjn/dg1cgHndnaD2zjd3KfspWo=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gEg7khddTf32JTpr9oeFhYHx8mQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:22:10 -0000

Another thing you can do is to register your draft's copyright with copyright.gov and then sue them to have it removed.  Hopefully you won't have to do that.

Tim



On 10/20/2020 1:14 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:


Hi Jay,

 

Could you please do the following request?

 

Deleting these IDs completely from the IETF repository:

 

1)     Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10).

2)     IPmix.

3)     KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP).

4)     Regional Routing Protocol (RRP).

5)     Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP).

6)     Satellite Internet (SI).

7)     ASN Label Switching Protocol (ALSP).

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Khaled Omar

 

From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 7:10 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; ietf@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-draft-submission@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.


I would ask an IESG member.  And I think Jay Daley offered up legal@ietf.org on a different thread.



On 10/20/2020 1:00 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:



Dear IETFers,


I hope this is my last e-mail with the IETF and I’m not feeling coward to repeat my first request regarding deleting my drafts from the IETF repository.


Can anyone tell me whom is the responsible person for deleting drafts from the IETF?


P.S. I don’t want to find any BCP or whatever that mention that the original author of the draft has not the right to ask for deleting his drafts as this doesn’t make any sense.


I wish you good luck after the deletion and the ideas not being used by the IETF as they have no benefits as many claims.


Sorry for any disturbance.


Regards,


Khaled Omar



v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email