IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BC912D967; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pb3-mpaA-Jv3; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5002A12D965; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v7-v6so3207453pgs.0; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nMqjtY1wGRbgR2RguEQ9YRcxTRDLkkG/sYkB/zwkUPQ=; b=olFWX5vqkkPuG4jq6FRoztL561f0vffPqDrW8r5JyjT9mSBaCYEO7QrX8T8xvDSX/o uEj5q12hUE5KCKEf/Gahn9kyFVZmzBBWhmXmyGBW9Dav8HYs+JUjTCK9dWEjcIC54/DD 75ZefWgpLsNZfJ/rjUgpJ/DDLxL6FqhhcPSR8Hrn1HiMiA+i1AUXiBk14mIN/Qq04HGp WBG2bXiwp093Umid8WudJ5INTM/sOJZWgBIqnZhJWCumQbx8aswqWezeCJHkvVHnWdZu c36sqKiRadgkQLzBMdM3NhTQaTqM+XjXp3KhD3PxIH+gptaq8FCkZEzKh5X/8IZ3TsFQ Gefw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nMqjtY1wGRbgR2RguEQ9YRcxTRDLkkG/sYkB/zwkUPQ=; b=p3tajKtQMsQEAvvC1ZOJ55Z20/vVe7sD9Xlj4Q8joNwGx+9ZLUghbLy4R2ptdz9gzu V8yVwBDbUob330ySmW2hsNB3HeSS09uFYcvulSEOMWRGhWVs0zxC8fz2Dv0drh5G0ktd KBH8sMOL6e6CELmYIBfYFkYcUmlnsPe0vwEk4UWuSiJt6YchwZxS80VjactiQE1p6kKe hz+WjjZXslvQLjFAQ4piYxnz743St7M4IaE1ksTtZlo0m2WwnTAiGPJmhZ44gkKjI7dD dPztJpKwdKLei33CWtdARFl1d+j6WwYtRtPCJUSdkch9I3+EXISPkwyADJSA02l9fVq5 MXzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwc4vZPhR4OH8goPHTva03sB/3rEWJu+eJFGa37YGHGGj0WXVt6i ZnB4gUwbd1ySW/5R3fill/fJXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq96ilpxXQ+l4glIkTdQstk9qO6+cAxXMxIbX9sgAoHawiKBeUc2/McZOPyBAvJNjiDHJiO/A==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:741d:: with SMTP id p29-v6mr9669531pgc.451.1526331592730; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.27] ([118.148.121.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y197-v6sm20699097pfg.184.2018.05.14.13.59.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 May 2018 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <3678CC52-1F1B-4B17-8654-E75C9B63AD39@ietf.org> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B043AE7@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B0824E35-23D5-4836-8D1B-423830F3E6A8@nohats.ca> <6dc1e452-2168-a00e-fb2b-d48a46aa895d@pi.nu> <36fab0bc-ef5d-070a-be86-9d0d74d95ceb@gmail.com> <A7FEF9B7DDF04627AC7F6056@PSB> <dd0bacae-290b-ad23-cdbf-8c159462c436@nostrum.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6b767b18-f1af-0d91-60e1-164a0bd40226@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:59:47 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dd0bacae-290b-ad23-cdbf-8c159462c436@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gGztOfw8Ron0O3lC4BlUAuVTWS8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 20:59:55 -0000

On 15/05/2018 08:51, Adam Roach wrote:
...
> I have yet to see any comments on the fact that we have O(30) working 
> groups ask not to be scheduled on Fridays every single meeting. 
...
> I am curious if anyone has thoughts about how this particular scheduling 
> difficulty can be addressed beyond what we might learn from the Bangkok 
> experiment.

By simply ignoring those requests in the scheduling process.

I've found Friday morning meetings to be very useful. Firstly
there are fewer lookers-on and secondly they run efficiently
because nobody wants them to over-run.

(That applies up to about 11:30 a.m. Later than that, people really are
eager to get to the airport.)

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email