Re: IETF and open source license compatibility

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Fri, 13 February 2009 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739FB28C25A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:27:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yDtsIfbt5cFO for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C777428C25D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id EC249135E09F; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:27:44 -0500 (EST)
To: simon@josefsson.org, smb@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
In-Reply-To: <20090213082202.65bce9e9@cs.columbia.edu>
Message-Id: <20090213132744.EC249135E09F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:27:44 -0500
From: sob@harvard.edu
Cc: harald@alvestrand.no, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:27:40 -0000

> > A more interesting question is if you can submit somebody else's
> > public domain work to the IETF.  I don't know the answer to that.
> 
> Legally, yes; it's public domain.  Academic honesty and common courtesy
> would demand an acknowledgment.

more than that - the standards process requires an acknowledgment of all 
significant contributers so an acknowledgment is required

Scott