Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Wed, 23 October 2013 09:43 UTC
Return-Path: <tytso@thunk.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF1E11E8156 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id omYklfh4I+u6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe96:be03]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6273811E833C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by imap.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tytso@thunk.org>) id 1VYuxM-0000MR-0p; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:42:24 +0000
Received: by closure.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id C48BB580507; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 05:42:21 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=thunk.org; s=mail; t=1382521341; bh=8O/gehSgqzbdVOluwWANKtn05jp9q4QbPlLydcrXxBw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=J62zYSXRkJ9PxReteJpvY4g1I+LqeFSas5GanwCUoY0jOomq1phNWo3W0tWaizH8l 1l5xzA5xpRhvS6IUeBqEXTEzVHPFB9VJC5jTh+D9QcRPWqY4pydIxcA24okwOgTJPV ti5T+4hUzIxrVPVUi3wOpInsp6qvGMwflURuvQrY=
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 05:42:21 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Message-ID: <20131023094221.GA17772@thunk.org>
References: <B728B514-BC07-4D6E-899E-385C03C37430@ietf.org> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA6FB41@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <20131022093052.GF9517@thunk.org> <151B3C7B-907C-494F-B5FA-2D70C93EF2B4@nominum.com> <20131022214307.GA2603@thunk.org> <284D2EAD-5557-4A3C-BCC1-DFA739816F15@nominum.com> <20131022225448.GA18249@thunk.org> <CADnDZ89cMtiRc7+A6984oCEbd2K4XXgQEn7pPUXHWKwNMCbemQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89cMtiRc7+A6984oCEbd2K4XXgQEn7pPUXHWKwNMCbemQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:43:34 -0000
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > > Harassment is unwelcome hostile or intimidating behavior, in > > particular speech and behavior that is sexually aggressive or > > intimidates based on attributes like race, gender, religion, age, > > color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sexual orientation, > > or gender identity. > > How does this policy help if there is no identity known by the one who > abuses other identified people? Usually harrassment will come from people > that hide their identity, gender, religion, race, etc, because they don't > want policies to affect their behavior/future, or most important > their real-work or real-title or real-reputation in the IETF or in its WGs > (the system policy attacker likes to have more faces/addresses instead of > more hats/authorities). So, my understanding of the harassment policy is that a statement such as "Certifying Authorities can't be trusted to be competent at validating the entity requesting a certificate is really authorized to speak for Certificate Subject" would not be harassment because Certifying Authorities is not a protected class. On the other hand, a statement such as, "I don't believe you because you are heterosexual", or "We can't trust Joe because he is a Pastafarian", etc., would be arrassment, because they are based on the proctected classes listed above. Note that in both of these examples, it does not matter what identity class(es) the sender happens to fall into, whether he/she/it is Male, a Pastafarian, Tibetian, wheelchair-bound, etc. I agree with the suggestion that giving some examples of things which would be clearly considered by an ombudsperson and those that would not would be very useful. - Ted
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Scott Brim
- Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Poli… John Levine
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Ted Hardie
- Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy IETF Chair
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Livingood, Jason
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Randy Bush
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Donald Eastlake
- Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Poli… Warren Kumari
- Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Poli… Melinda Shore
- Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Hara… Warren Kumari
- Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Hara… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassme… Jari Arkko
- Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassme… John C Klensin
- Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassme… Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Fred Baker (fred)
- RE: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy l.wood
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Ted Lemon
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Cullen Jennings
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Cullen Jennings
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Ted Lemon
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Scott Brim
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Theodore Ts'o
- Fwd: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy Bjoern Hoehrmann