Re: A mailing list protocol

Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu> Wed, 05 December 2012 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <swb@internet2.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910321F8BE5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:35:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RzKbyJ57ifei for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from int-proxy01.merit.edu (int-proxy01.merit.edu [207.75.116.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C97021F8BE4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by int-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75B2100013; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:35:31 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at int-proxy01.merit.edu
Received: from int-proxy01.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (int-proxy01.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmko1gm54AX4; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:35:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from com.flipdogsolutions (cpe-67-241-75-185.twcny.res.rr.com [67.241.75.185]) by int-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CBED100001; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:35:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:34:32 -0500
From: Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Message-ID: <6eef05ba-d970-4f6b-9fde-acbd93035544.maildroid@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWG6Gn+StCBdft2Ku7B7pbZ-aS=6x2evESGzAr1EvnDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20121204183432.3748.97064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121204121234.09360870@resistor.net> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230338CCCD84@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <CABkgnnWG6Gn+StCBdft2Ku7B7pbZ-aS=6x2evESGzAr1EvnDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A mailing list protocol
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1_1118717384.1354671272599"
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:35:33 -0000

Those are all endpoint implementation problems and thus not subject to IETF standardization :-)