IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Fri, 04 April 2008 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5258F28C4AE; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470843A6943 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNSgYN1t00B3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CA728C385 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb] ([IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m34Ef6nS057727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:41:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <FB084441-D45C-4191-BD01-37ED43D6B58D@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <47F63D21.6000304@ericsson.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:41:12 +0200
References: <47F56545.4020603@isoc.org> <200804032322.m33NMgbH052817@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080404001204.AF5AC5081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC30BCBDE823C@mail.acmepacket.com> <47F63D21.6000304@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 4 apr 2008, at 16:37, Suresh Krishnan wrote:

> And in addition, somebody could be in the room AND be aware of IPR and
> NOT SIGN the blue sheet. There is nothing saying that people in the  
> room
> have to sign a blue sheet. I, for one, have seen people pass around  
> blue
> sheets without signing.

Not disagreeing with your previous point, but your observation doesn't  
prove it: the people in question could have signed earlier.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email