Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Sat, 25 March 2023 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B3BC14CE22 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJyGjpnJrKXJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D89C14CF1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xse131.mail2web.com ([66.113.196.131] helo=xse.mail2web.com) by mx36.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1pg5y0-0001Gf-C1 for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 16:38:15 +0100
Received: from xsmtp21.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.60]) by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PkNWS5lw5zBdB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.16] (helo=xmail06.myhosting.com) by xsmtp21.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1pg5xs-0003uc-Lk for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:37:56 -0700
Received: (qmail 5146 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2023 15:37:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.104]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.43.90]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail06.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; 25 Mar 2023 15:37:55 -0000
Message-ID: <caf7a369-361b-f29d-628e-78f38f4af521@huitema.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:37:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <02F23373-9F6A-420E-91B3-C1ADE5AF2A60@staff.ietf.org> <928d9a46-ff69-12df-fc30-b0ff7f1f8cec@huitema.net> <B8DF18B2-77A2-4A6B-962A-DEFBB1EDFF5A@staff.ietf.org> <316ff116-535a-d0c0-31e8-ff2ca3fe5871@lear.ch> <97d4fa2f-6ba0-ff49-1e8a-a1d6ea13d8ad@gmail.com> <CACQW0EqZbM5NGE8Yy7c5d3UEsx+1rF8k3nv0_fR14nvLygkz+A@mail.gmail.com> <79bf9526-b521-1c77-eacb-172735de02e7@earthlink.net> <1b37b32f-3166-fbbb-dfc7-070f06c9215b@huitema.net> <4224F236-75B3-4107-A14F-1395147EBFE3@depht.com> <3cad4437-dd62-f306-c454-f28a325f486a@gmx.de>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Subject: Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF
In-Reply-To: <3cad4437-dd62-f306-c454-f28a325f486a@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.196.131
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.196.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=66.113.196.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.16)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT8itkdrO3G9W23c9r+EqC8RPUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5x9j7219Tb9QoiGKb6esGsuKj/EwzSHE5FGYwwjsNRPCDlf uDsg+oX9C3aELnzCI2/mD6wdmZPcItWbGe10hXJtXL4FsauCVkDjmcYJdU3yWp7KuHNaaKdg7iBE ZefdsNUFWKwa/wzJUjmazeC7ImcaNBKcdTdc91qyPxC6lUXydRQ6V51u76v35b1wNe/MvdKnG+eT s8kbKBy2XcsLzqKfpbt3W3gfNnuKkqGP09ZKLP25Cgscc2Nqd9azmDa4ZbYxn04qRLKGrOrEzQDq o2Fe5e0H1p2YD3fIDgqE3F/hSENKwnAR2oVisY+bnEqWCKi5klmK1va3wJScg92pg//jdNpXP/ul EV6DIUDLc0Yd6iTlYE+Zcn8p1rPpG64P1y7nVrUQfxkYoV3jt7fqlPgR+jdIhbfj7vAUd+Fv1cEH clnsyWu8Q0HDoORE+fy5gr3LgKffTIgl7nuGO/IJU1342OUMeHyTpNN0eXybX/w7/4a+Zyc1sUYl ckMDbruAhxcJTS4OeKP4ef9h57M/ryLtl9zCgF3/Wb2aVzRyLsyVc5sm42p7F3XMSiY7InzOeaRt ZtfxRhlObSdBzhCSVO4+EnFzsC48bTEFY06/YbB87aZA2T1TDpm1DkXX6Es5zXntCB3G1CwpaI3Z 4ESkMWDVJEenxBoIht3V0nekAoxXAvN3a2rvCaGbWBxf3ZaCXr2yuLfHqAnAj7rgKH7+eCmmAdeY qIktckeOIWqGc04481ShcA6Xvva2QAVEjpqzANbJ1UfXmet2cbFKoyT/OdZL8ke58SUAxpsdf3bm 0NgB720AuXq0T17woJo3avKeADIsy647Mn0zwmGzAi3Zn+YdthRNgs7Ig4l/XErpYn3glZTKFuaT l19W3ISq9+1KiLsESGU+y+fjdgjudZxiTPi+MG1QP35nsYfP84c+RFK3KiZuZ5OAUoGBziSYFLZu u6zX3xxsmqT8l9ARlsTalAaf
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine14.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ganoVAC-Aotjveulymp4ESaFBqw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 15:38:30 -0000


On 3/25/2023 5:36 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 25.03.2023 11:48, Andrew McConachie wrote:
>> ...
>> Trains and planes are fundamentally different in this regard, because
>> planes calculate their weight at takeoff and only take as much fuel as
>> they need. The amount of CO2 produced by a passenger plane is directly
>> proportional to how many passengers it’s carrying.
>> ...
> 
> So a passenger plane not carrying any passengers is not producing any CO2?

I think Andrew erred when he said "directly proportional". As in many 
things, you can probably separate fixed costs and variable costs. There 
is a fixed cost to carrying the whole weight of the empty plane and the 
crew through the sky. There is also a variable cost based on the load of 
the plane, which for a passenger plane means the weight of passengers 
and their luggage. So yes, an additional passenger directly increases 
the fuel consumption of the plane -- but less so than if too few 
passengers lead the airline to fly fewer planes. And the "fewer plane" 
effect is entirely comparable to the "fewer trains" effect.

-- Christian Huitema